These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22194718)

  • 1. Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
    Stein T; Hebart MN; Sterzer P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():167. PubMed ID: 22194718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.
    Gayet S; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CL
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():460. PubMed ID: 24904476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can emotional content be extracted under interocular suppression?
    Yang YH; Yeh SL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206799. PubMed ID: 30419039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Faces in commonly experienced configurations enter awareness faster due to their curvature relative to fixation.
    Moors P; Wagemans J; de-Wit L
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1565. PubMed ID: 26839746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Privileged detection of conspecifics: evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression.
    Stein T; Sterzer P; Peelen MV
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):64-79. PubMed ID: 22776239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the use of continuous flash suppression for the study of visual processing outside of awareness.
    Yang E; Brascamp J; Kang MS; Blake R
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():724. PubMed ID: 25071685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adults' awareness of faces follows newborns' looking preferences.
    Stein T; Peelen MV; Sterzer P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29361. PubMed ID: 22216259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CFS-crafter: An open-source tool for creating and analyzing images for continuous flash suppression experiments.
    Wang G; Alais D; Blake R; Han S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2004-2020. PubMed ID: 35794414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new 'CFS tracking' paradigm reveals uniform suppression depth regardless of target complexity or salience.
    Alais D; Coorey J; Blake R; Davidson MJ
    Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38682887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Own-race and own-age biases facilitate visual awareness of faces under interocular suppression.
    Stein T; End A; Sterzer P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():582. PubMed ID: 25136308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.
    Gayet S; Stein T
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():437. PubMed ID: 28396645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in continuous flash suppression: Potency and linkages to binocular rivalry dynamics.
    Blake R; Goodman R; Tomarken A; Kim HW
    Vision Res; 2019 Jul; 160():10-23. PubMed ID: 31002836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing the attentional modulation of unconscious processing under interocular suppression in a spatial cueing paradigm.
    Handschack J; Rothkirch M; Sterzer P; Hesselmann G
    Cortex; 2022 Aug; 153():32-43. PubMed ID: 35576671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural processing of visual information under interocular suppression: a critical review.
    Sterzer P; Stein T; Ludwig K; Rothkirch M; Hesselmann G
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():453. PubMed ID: 24904469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression.
    Izatt G; Dubois J; Faivre N; Koch C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():659. PubMed ID: 25071634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuous Flash Suppression: Stimulus Fractionation rather than Integration.
    Moors P; Hesselmann G; Wagemans J; van Ee R
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2017 Oct; 21(10):719-721. PubMed ID: 28690078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No effect of attentional modulation by spatial cueing in a masked numerical priming paradigm using continuous flash suppression (CFS).
    Handschack J; Rothkirch M; Sterzer P; Hesselmann G
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14607. PubMed ID: 36632138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing unconscious processing during continuous flash suppression and meta-contrast masking just under the limen of consciousness.
    Peremen Z; Lamy D
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():969. PubMed ID: 25309469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze direction and face orientation modulate perceptual sensitivity to faces under interocular suppression.
    Lanfranco RC; Stein T; Rabagliati H; Carmel D
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7640. PubMed ID: 35538138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Access to Awareness for Faces during Continuous Flash Suppression Is Not Modulated by Affective Knowledge.
    Rabovsky M; Stein T; Abdel Rahman R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0150931. PubMed ID: 27119743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.