These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22194896)

  • 1. Shortening of subjective visual intervals followed by repetitive stimulation.
    Ono F; Kitazawa S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28722. PubMed ID: 22194896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shortening of subjective tone intervals followed by repetitive tone stimuli.
    Ono F; Kitazawa S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 20139462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective shortening with filled and unfilled auditory and visual intervals in humans?
    Wearden JH; Goodson G; Foran K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1616-28. PubMed ID: 17853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sounds Modulate the Perceived Duration of Visual Stimuli via Crossmodal Integration.
    Asaoka R; Gyoba J
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(4-5):319-35. PubMed ID: 29384606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective frequency in flicker perception.
    Fukuda T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 905079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audio-visual integration in temporal perception.
    Wada Y; Kitagawa N; Noguchi K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):117-24. PubMed ID: 14511840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flicker-Induced Time Dilation Does Not Modulate EEG Correlates of Temporal Encoding.
    Herbst SK; Chaumon M; Penney TB; Busch NA
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jul; 28(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 25117576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps.
    Walker JT; Scott KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1327-39. PubMed ID: 6458656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual effects in interval-duration judgements in vision, audition and touch.
    Burr D; Della Rocca E; Morrone MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 230(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 23864044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How long depends on how fast--perceived flicker dilates subjective duration.
    Herbst SK; Javadi AH; van der Meer E; Busch NA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76074. PubMed ID: 24194829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What you see depends on what you hear: Temporal averaging and crossmodal integration.
    Chen L; Zhou X; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1851-1864. PubMed ID: 30211578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On perceived synchrony-neural dynamics of audiovisual illusions and suppressions.
    Noesselt T; Bonath B; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():132-41. PubMed ID: 17956754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.
    Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferior parietal lobule encodes visual temporal resolution processes contributing to the critical flicker frequency threshold in humans.
    Nardella A; Rocchi L; Conte A; Bologna M; Suppa A; Berardelli A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98948. PubMed ID: 24905987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transient twinkle perception is induced by sequential presentation of stimuli that flicker at frequencies above the critical fusion frequency.
    Nakajima Y; Sakaguchi Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2711-27. PubMed ID: 26198710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 0 + 1 > 1: How adding noninformative sound improves performance on a visual task.
    Kim R; Peters MA; Shams L
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jan; 23(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22127367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory-visual interactions and the correspondence between perceived auditory space and perceived visual space.
    Regan D; Spekreijse H
    Perception; 1977; 6(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 876814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.