These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22195041)

  • 21. The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.
    Zelinsky GJ; Bisley JW
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 25581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Small numerosity advantage for sequential enumeration on RSVP stimuli: an object individuation-based account.
    Cheng X; Lin C; Lou C; Zhang W; Han Y; Ding X; Fan Z
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):734-763. PubMed ID: 31696296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Failures in top-down control in schizophrenia revealed by patterns of saccadic eye movements.
    Bansal S; Robinson BM; Leonard CJ; Hahn B; Luck SJ; Gold JM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Jul; 128(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 31192637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Salience drives overt selection of two equally relevant visual targets.
    Christie GJ; Spalek TM; McDonald JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 29949118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search.
    de Vries IE; van Driel J; Olivers CN
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(6):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 28069918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Saliency maps for finding changes in visual scenes?
    Liesefeld HR; Liesefeld AM; Müller HJ; Rangelov D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2190-2201. PubMed ID: 28718177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search.
    Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1786-96. PubMed ID: 23565744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual working memory depends on attentional filtering.
    Cowan N; Morey CC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Apr; 10(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 16497538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two's company, three's a crowd: Individuation is necessary for object recognition.
    Chakravarthi R; Herbert A
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():69-82. PubMed ID: 30576886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Individuation of parts of a single object and multiple distinct objects relies on a common neural mechanism in inferior intraparietal sulcus.
    Wurm MF; Porter KB; Caramazza A
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():1-15. PubMed ID: 31539828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 20350059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Top-down modulation of alpha power and pattern similarity for threatening representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Li CH; Lin SH; Hu SH; Yeh YY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():21-30. PubMed ID: 28887064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.
    Woodman GF; Luck SJ; Schall JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i118-24. PubMed ID: 17725994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A pure salience response in posterior parietal cortex.
    Arcizet F; Mirpour K; Bisley JW
    Cereb Cortex; 2011 Nov; 21(11):2498-506. PubMed ID: 21422270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.