These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22195079)
1. Analyzing the heterogeneity and complexity of Electronic Health Record oriented phenotyping algorithms. Conway M; Berg RL; Carrell D; Denny JC; Kho AN; Kullo IJ; Linneman JG; Pacheco JA; Peissig P; Rasmussen L; Weston N; Chute CG; Pathak J AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():274-83. PubMed ID: 22195079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of Using EN 13606 Clinical Archetypes for Defining Computable Phenotypes. Tapuria A; Kalra D; Curcin V Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 270():228-232. PubMed ID: 32570380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the NQF Quality Data Model for representing Electronic Health Record driven phenotyping algorithms. Thompson WK; Rasmussen LV; Pacheco JA; Peissig PL; Denny JC; Kho AN; Miller A; Pathak J AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():911-20. PubMed ID: 23304366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Semantic Web Technologies for Storing Computable Definitions of Electronic Health Records Phenotyping Algorithms. Papež V; Denaxas S; Hemingway H AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1352-1361. PubMed ID: 29854204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A case study evaluating the portability of an executable computable phenotype algorithm across multiple institutions and electronic health record environments. Pacheco JA; Rasmussen LV; Kiefer RC; Campion TR; Speltz P; Carroll RJ; Stallings SC; Mo H; Ahuja M; Jiang G; LaRose ER; Peissig PL; Shang N; Benoit B; Gainer VS; Borthwick K; Jackson KL; Sharma A; Wu AY; Kho AN; Roden DM; Pathak J; Denny JC; Thompson WK J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Nov; 25(11):1540-1546. PubMed ID: 30124903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms. Mo H; Thompson WK; Rasmussen LV; Pacheco JA; Jiang G; Kiefer R; Zhu Q; Xu J; Montague E; Carrell DS; Lingren T; Mentch FD; Ni Y; Wehbe FH; Peissig PL; Tromp G; Larson EB; Chute CG; Pathak J; Denny JC; Speltz P; Kho AN; Jarvik GP; Bejan CA; Williams MS; Borthwick K; Kitchner TE; Roden DM; Harris PA J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1220-30. PubMed ID: 26342218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential Role of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria in Electronic Phenotyping. Chen Z; Liu H; Butler A; Ostropolets A; Weng C Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():148-152. PubMed ID: 34042723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling Adverse Events with the TOP Phenotyping Framework. Beger C; Boehmer AM; Mussawy B; Redeker L; Matthies F; Schäfermeier R; Härdtlein A; Dreischulte T; Neumann D; Uciteli A Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Sep; 307():69-77. PubMed ID: 37697839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling and executing electronic health records driven phenotyping algorithms using the NQF Quality Data Model and JBoss® Drools Engine. Li D; Endle CM; Murthy S; Stancl C; Suesse D; Sottara D; Huff SM; Chute CG; Pathak J AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():532-41. PubMed ID: 23304325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records. Hoffman SR; Vines AI; Halladay JR; Pfaff E; Schiff L; Westreich D; Sundaresan A; Johnson LS; Nicholson WK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):610.e1-610.e7. PubMed ID: 29432754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE. Ahmad FS; Ricket IM; Hammill BG; Eskenazi L; Robertson HR; Curtis LH; Dobi CD; Girotra S; Haynes K; Kizer JR; Kripalani S; Roe MT; Roumie CL; Waitman R; Jones WS; Weiner MG Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e006292. PubMed ID: 32466729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making work visible for electronic phenotype implementation: Lessons learned from the eMERGE network. Shang N; Liu C; Rasmussen LV; Ta CN; Caroll RJ; Benoit B; Lingren T; Dikilitas O; Mentch FD; Carrell DS; Wei WQ; Luo Y; Gainer VS; Kullo IJ; Pacheco JA; Hakonarson H; Walunas TL; Denny JC; Wiley K; Murphy SN; Hripcsak G; Weng C J Biomed Inform; 2019 Nov; 99():103293. PubMed ID: 31542521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review and evaluation of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithm authoring tools for clinical and translational research. Xu J; Rasmussen LV; Shaw PL; Jiang G; Kiefer RC; Mo H; Pacheco JA; Speltz P; Zhu Q; Denny JC; Pathak J; Thompson WK; Montague E J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1251-60. PubMed ID: 26224336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phenotyping issues for exploring electronic health records to design clinical trials. Schnall J; Zhang L; Chen J Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):402-404. PubMed ID: 32522027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of "Possible Patients" on Phenotyping Algorithms: Electronic Phenotype Algorithms Can Only Be Reproduced by Sharing Detailed Annotation Criteria. Kagawa R; Kawazoe Y; Shinohara E; Imai T; Ohe K Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():432-436. PubMed ID: 29295131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Considerations for Improving the Portability of Electronic Health Record-Based Phenotype Algorithms. Rasmussen LV; Brandt PS; Jiang G; Kiefer RC; Pacheco JA; Adekkanattu P; Ancker JS; Wang F; Xu Z; Pathak J; Luo Y AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():755-764. PubMed ID: 32308871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of various phenotyping algorithms for Diabetes Mellitus using data from electronic health records. Esteban S; Rodríguez Tablado M; Peper FE; Mahumud YS; Ricci RI; Kopitowski KS; Terrasa SA Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():53-70. PubMed ID: 29054261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Recognizing and understanding illnesses: weight gain as the main symptom]. Lindner UK Pflege Z; 2008 Oct; 61(10):588-90. PubMed ID: 19009803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel semantic representation for eligibility criteria in clinical trials. Chondrogiannis E; Andronikou V; Tagaris A; Karanastasis E; Varvarigou T; Tsuji M J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():10-23. PubMed ID: 28336477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]