BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22195189)

  • 1. Identifying certification criteria for home care EHR Meaningful Use.
    Sockolow PS; Adelsberger MC; Bowles KH
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1280-9. PubMed ID: 22195189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impacts of EHR Certification and Meaningful Use Implementation on an Integrated Delivery Network.
    Bowes WA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():325-32. PubMed ID: 25954335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2015 Edition Health Information Technology (Health IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition Base Electronic Health Record (EHR) Definition, and ONC Health IT Certification Program Modifications. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    Fed Regist; 2015 Oct; 80(200):62601-759. PubMed ID: 26477063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing readiness for meeting meaningful use: identifying electronic health record functionality and measuring levels of adoption.
    Bowes WA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2010 Nov; 2010():66-70. PubMed ID: 21346942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feds propose tougher look at whether EHRs work.
    Tahir D
    Mod Healthc; 2015 Mar; 45(13):12. PubMed ID: 25980059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are all certified EHRs created equal? Assessing the relationship between EHR vendor and hospital meaningful use performance.
    Holmgren AJ; Adler-Milstein J; McCullough J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jun; 25(6):654-660. PubMed ID: 29186508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 2010 Jul; 75(144):44589-654. PubMed ID: 20677416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 2012 Sep; 77(171):54163-292. PubMed ID: 22946139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stage 2 EHR final rule is released.
    Health Devices; 2012 Oct; 41(10):331-2. PubMed ID: 23444674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finally, an EHR certification to bank on.
    Morrissey J
    Behav Healthc; 2011; 31(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 21401009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes to the electronic health records market in light of health information technology certification and meaningful use.
    Vest JR; Yoon J; Bossak BH
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 22917839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Only credentialed medical assistants can enter EHR orders.
    Lewis M
    Med Econ; 2014 Mar; 91(5):40. PubMed ID: 25137908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Persuading the leopards to change their spots.
    Illman J
    Health Serv J; 2013 Oct; 123(6369):26-9. PubMed ID: 24383190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the EHR: a simpler future?
    Grantham D
    Behav Healthc; 2013; 33(5):32, 34-5. PubMed ID: 24298702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EHR certification: getting comfortable with the concept.
    Drummond R
    Health Manag Technol; 2011 Jul; 32(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 21863706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2014 Edition Release 2 Electronic Health Record (EHR) certification criteria and the ONC HIT Certification Program; regulatory flexibilities, improvements, and enhanced health information exchange. Final rule.
    Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services
    Fed Regist; 2014 Sep; 79(176):54429-80. PubMed ID: 25233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative.
    D'Amore JD; Mandel JC; Kreda DA; Swain A; Koromia GA; Sundareswaran S; Alschuler L; Dolin RH; Mandl KD; Kohane IS; Ramoni RB
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(6):1060-8. PubMed ID: 24970839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stage 3 EHR meaningful use proposals include eight core goals.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2015 May; 40(5):49-51. PubMed ID: 26000359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress and challenge in meeting meaningful use at an integrated delivery network.
    Bowes WA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():144-51. PubMed ID: 22195065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EHR 2014: highlights of the proposed stage 2 certification rule.
    Heubusch K
    J AHIMA; 2012 May; 83(5):38-9. PubMed ID: 22670326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.