These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22196181)

  • 1. Intrarater agreement about the etiology of Class II malocclusion and treatment approach.
    Dolce C; Mansour DA; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22196181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontists' views on indications for and timing of orthodontic treatment in Finnish public oral health care.
    Pietilä I; Pietilä T; Pirttiniemi P; Varrela J; Alanen P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17962314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
    Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontists' perceptions of the impact of phase 1 treatment for Class II malocclusion on phase 2 needs.
    King GJ; Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Aiosa LS; Bloom RM; Taylor MG
    J Dent Res; 1999 Nov; 78(11):1745-53. PubMed ID: 10576171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case report. Dental malocclusion Class I skeletal, Division II, Class II Angle classification.
    Willis LM
    J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1993 Jun; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 9511524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.
    Janson G; Camardella LT; Araki JD; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Orthodontics in general practice 3. Angle Class II/1 malocclusion: one-phase treatment treatment preferred to two-phase treatment].
    Kuijpers MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Jan; 115(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18265733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Keeling SD; Yurkiewicz L; Taylor MG; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 10456600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corrective methods for Class II patients.
    Logn JR; Casamassimo PS
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Dec; 10(4):342-4. PubMed ID: 3272961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case report. Crozat non-extraction treatment of a Class II skeletal & dental malocclusion.
    Sack C
    J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1997 Sep; 14(3):4-8. PubMed ID: 9511522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.