341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22196186)
1. Long-term skeletal and dental stability of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis with a hybrid distractor.
King JW; Wallace JC; Winter DL; Niculescu JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 22196186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term skeletal and dental effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Del Santo M; Guerrero CA; Buschang PH; English JD; Samchukov ML; Bell WH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 11094362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis on mandibular structures.
Malkoç S; Işeri H; Karaman AI; Mutlu N; Küçükkolbaşi H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 17110257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term skeletal effects of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. An implant study.
Iseri H; Malkoç S
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 16043467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal and dental effects of tooth-borne versus hybrid devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Niculescu JA; King JW; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 23786596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of transmandibular symphyseal distraction on teeth, bone, and temporomandibular joint.
Gunbay T; Akay MC; Aras A; Gomel M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 19761921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients.
O'Grady PW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16905065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis using a bone-supported distractor.
Bayram M; Ozer M; Alkan A
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):745-52. PubMed ID: 17605491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term effects of symphyseal distraction and rapid maxillary expansion on pharyngeal airway dimensions, tongue, and hyoid position.
Malkoç S; Uşümez S; Işeri H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):769-75. PubMed ID: 18068595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the performance of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Boccaccio A; Cozzani M; Pappalettere C
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 20709724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: review of three techniques.
Alkan A; Ozer M; Baş B; Bayram M; Celebi N; Inal S; Ozden B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 17223309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular midline distraction using a simple device.
Uckan S; Guler N; Arman A; Mutlu N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 16731388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Sukurica Y; Gurel HG; Mutlu N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 38(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19682916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis--simplified.
Chopra SS; Sahoo NK; Jayan B
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 23941027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different orthodontic devices for mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: a finite element study.
Boccaccio A; Lamberti L; Pappalettere C; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 18675208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results of bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral tooth-borne device in adult Class II patients.
El-Bialy TH; Razdolsky Y; Kravitz ND; Dessner S; Elgazzar RF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1446-53. PubMed ID: 23790589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability, tipping and relapse of bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion; a prospective randomized patient trial.
Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ; Hop WC; van der Wal KG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 19278832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective changes to condylar position in symphyseal distraction osteogenesis.
Landes CA; Laudemann K; Sader R; Mack M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18547830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term skeletodental stability of mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: Tooth-borne vs hybrid distraction appliances.
Durham JN; King JW; Robinson QC; Trojan TM
Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 27654627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
