102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22196386)
1. MRI criteria of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis revisited.
Chatha DS; Schweitzer ME
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 22196386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining clinically relevant values for developmental spinal stenosis: a large-scale magnetic resonance imaging study.
Cheung JP; Samartzis D; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):1067-76. PubMed ID: 24732859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Lee S; Lee JW; Yeom JS; Kim KJ; Kim HJ; Chung SK; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
Cihangiroglu M; Yildirim H; Bozgeyik Z; Senol U; Ozdemir H; Topsakal C; Yilmaz S
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 15294326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI.
Keorochana G; Taghavi CE; Lee KB; Yoo JH; Liao JC; Fei Z; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(11):893-8. PubMed ID: 21242877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of neuroforaminal decompression in degenerative spinal stenosis.
Gill TJ; Mason MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):135-9. PubMed ID: 9553545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurements of ligamentum flavum thickening at lumbar spine using MRI.
Sakamaki T; Sairyo K; Sakai T; Tamura T; Okada Y; Mikami H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1415-9. PubMed ID: 19280205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modified MRI short time inversion recovery sequence grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration].
Pan W; Wang J; Liu J; Lu Y; Huang B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1430-4. PubMed ID: 23316630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI study of the position of the conus medullaris in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ba Z; Zhao W; Wu D; Huang Y; Kan H
Orthopedics; 2012 Jun; 35(6):e899-902. PubMed ID: 22691664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer variability in the evaluation of multiple lumbar stenosis by routine MR--myelography and MRI.
Song KS; Jang EC; Jung HJ; Kim KW; Yu H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 19057250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The stenosis ratio: a new tool for the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis.
Laurencin CT; Lipson SJ; Senatus P; Botchwey E; Jones TR; Koris M; Hunter J
Int J Surg Investig; 1999; 1(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 11341632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thoracic and lumbar spine in diastrophic dysplasia: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Remes V; Tervahartiala P; Poussa M; Peltonen J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 11154540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual and quantitative assessment of lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sipola P; Leinonen V; Niemeläinen R; Aalto T; Vanninen R; Manninen H; Airaksinen O; Battié MC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1024-31. PubMed ID: 21969705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reproducibility of quantitative measurements in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging of children from the general population.
Masharawi Y; Kjaer P; Bendix T; Manniche C; Wedderkopp N; Sorensen JS; Peled N; Jensen TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2094-100. PubMed ID: 18758366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
