277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22196811)
1. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps.
Draganov PV; Chang MN; Alkhasawneh A; Dixon LR; Lieb J; Moshiree B; Polyak S; Sultan S; Collins D; Suman A; Valentine JF; Wagh MS; Habashi SL; Forsmark CE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 22196811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.
Lee CK; Shim JJ; Jang JY
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.
Desai S; Gupta S; Copur-Dahi N; Krinsky ML
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1206-1213. PubMed ID: 31183796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy.
Aslan F; Cekiç C; Camci M; Alper E; Ekinci N; Akpinar Z; Alpek S; Arabul M; Unsal B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e621. PubMed ID: 25881835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Jumbo biopsy forceps versus cold snares for removing diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Huh CW; Kim JS; Choi HH; Maeng IS; Jun SY; Kim BW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jul; 90(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 30684600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
Kim JS; Lee BI; Choi H; Jun SY; Park ES; Park JM; Lee IS; Kim BW; Kim SW; Choi MG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):741-7. PubMed ID: 25708763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.
Kim HS; Jung HY; Park HJ; Kim HM; Seong JH; Kang YS; Cho MY; Yu MH; Kang DR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 29409923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.
Park SK; Ko BM; Han JP; Hong SJ; Lee MS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive polyps in the colorectum.
Uraoka T; Ramberan H; Matsuda T; Fujii T; Yahagi N
Dig Endosc; 2014 Apr; 26 Suppl 2():98-103. PubMed ID: 24750157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps].
Löhnert MS; Wittmer A; Doniec JM
Zentralbl Chir; 2004 Aug; 129(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 15354251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.
Buchner AM; Guarner-Argente C; Ginsberg GG
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 22657404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local recurrence of diminutive colorectal polyps after cold forceps polypectomy with jumbo forceps followed by magnified narrow-band imaging: a multicenter prospective study.
Kuwai T; Yamada T; Toyokawa T; Iwase H; Kudo T; Esaka N; Ohta H; Yamashita H; Hosoda Y; Watanabe N; Harada N
Endoscopy; 2019 Mar; 51(3):253-260. PubMed ID: 30674046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Raad D; Tripathi P; Cooper G; Falck-Ytter Y
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 26545637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do forceps biopsies truthfully reflect the nature of endoscopically uncovered polypoid lesions of the colon?
Stermer E; Bejar J; Miselevich I; Goldstein O; Keren D; Lavy A; Boss JH; Keren D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jul; 7(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15932556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.
Komeda Y; Kashida H; Sakurai T; Tribonias G; Okamoto K; Kono M; Yamada M; Adachi T; Mine H; Nagai T; Asakuma Y; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Watanabe T; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Chiba Y; Kudo M
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24125514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of 50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosal fluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps.
Katsinelos P; Kountouras J; Paroutoglou G; Chatzimavroudis G; Zavos C; Pilpilidis I; Gelas G; Paikos D; Karakousis K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Oct; 68(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 18514651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.
Horiuchi A; Hosoi K; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 25922251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.
Elmunzer BJ; Higgins PD; Kwon YM; Golembeski C; Greenson JK; Korsnes SJ; Elta GH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Aug; 68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. PubMed ID: 18155204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagus surveillance biopsies.
Komanduri S; Swanson G; Keefer L; Jakate S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Dec; 70(6):1072-8.e1. PubMed ID: 19595312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
