These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22196993)
1. The value of adding a universal booking scan to an existing protocol of routine mid-gestation ultrasound scan. Poggenpoel EJ; Geerts LT; Theron GB Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 116(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 22196993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First-trimester pregnancy scanning as a screening tool for high-risk and abnormal pregnancies in a district general hospital setting. Drysdale K; Ridley D; Walker K; Higgins B; Dean T J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12521697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Lalor JG; Devane D Midwifery; 2007 Mar; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17011088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Routine obstetric ultrasound services. Walsh CA; McAuliffe F; Kinsella V; McParland P Ir Med J; 2013; 106(10):311-3. PubMed ID: 24579412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome--a prospective randomised controlled trial. Geerts LT; Brand EJ; Theron GB Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 103(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 8645639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial (ROUTE). Roma E; Arnau A; Berdala R; Bergos C; Montesinos J; Figueras F Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 26031399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting feasibility and quality of second-trimester ultrasound scans in obese pregnant women. Fuchs F; Houllier M; Voulgaropoulos A; Levaillant JM; Colmant C; Bouyer J; Senat MV Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 41(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 23023941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Ewigman B; LeFevre M; Hesser J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 76(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 2196496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practice variation of test procedures reportedly used in routine antenatal care in The Netherlands. Wildschut HI; ten Hoope-Bender P; Borkent-Polet M; Traas H; van Agt HM; de Kroon ML; van der Maas PJ Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jan; 78(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9926888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation-a randomised controlled trial in 39,572 pregnancies. Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Valentin L; Grunewald C BJOG; 2006 Jun; 113(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 16709209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of maternal body mass index on fetal anomaly screening. Hunsley C; Farrell T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():181-4. PubMed ID: 25305661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine ultrasound examination at 41 weeks of gestation and risk of post-term severe adverse fetal outcome: a retrospective evaluation of two units, within the same hospital, with different guidelines. Lindqvist PG; Pettersson K; Morén A; Kublickas M; Nordström L BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1108-15; discussion 1116. PubMed ID: 24593288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trial. Schwärzler P; Senat MV; Holden D; Bernard JP; Masroor T; Ville Y Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 14(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 10492867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 13-14-week fetal anatomy scan: a 5-year prospective study. Ebrashy A; El Kateb A; Momtaz M; El Sheikhah A; Aboulghar MM; Ibrahim M; Saad M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 35(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 20205205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine ultrasound examination at 12 or 18 gestational weeks for prenatal detection of major congenital heart malformations? A randomised controlled trial comprising 36,299 fetuses. Westin M; Saltvedt S; Bergman G; Kublickas M; Almström H; Grunewald C; Valentin L BJOG; 2006 Jun; 113(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 16709210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's expectations and intention to terminate pregnancy in case of abnormal findings at the second trimester level II ultrasound scan. A prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey. Athanasiadis AP; Polychronou P; Mikos T; Pantazis K; Assimakopoulos E; Tzevelekis F; Bontis JN Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19521092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11-14 gestational weeks]. Markov D; Chernev T; Dimitrova V; Mazneĭkova V; Leroy Y; Jacquemyn Y; Ramaekers P; Van Bulck B; Loquet P Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 15341249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound screening during pregnancy in Iran: womens' expectations, experiences and number of scans. Ranji A; Dykes AK Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21041007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early second trimester transvaginal ultrasound anomaly scan does not cause adverse perinatal outcome. Levmore-Tamir M; Tsafrir A; Boldes R; Rabinowitz R; Armon S; Shen O Early Hum Dev; 2015 Mar; 91(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 25706319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Booking ultrasound examinations performed by obstetric senior house officers--time to reevaluate? Bahmaie A; Edmonds DK Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Nov; 36(4):389-91. PubMed ID: 9006818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]