218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22197060)
1. Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis.
Jepma M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nieuwenhuis S
Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 22197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
Los SA; Horoufchin H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity.
Correa A; Triviño M; Pérez-Dueñas C; Acosta A; Lupiáñez J
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 20566235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed.
Vangkilde S; Coull JT; Bundesen C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1183-91. PubMed ID: 22250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model.
Schmitz F; Voss A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):222-50. PubMed ID: 22060144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm.
Kiefer M; Brendel D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 16494680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.
van den Brink RL; Murphy PR; Desender K; de Ru N; Nieuwenhuis S
J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):130-143. PubMed ID: 33172980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological correlates of temporal generalization: evidence for a two-process model of time perception.
Gibbons H; Rammsayer TH
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):195-209. PubMed ID: 15975771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus complexity and prospective timing: clues for a parallel process model of time perception.
Aubry F; Guillaume N; Mogicato G; Bergeret L; Celsis P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 18001688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation?
Seibold VC; Bausenhart KM; Rolke B; Ulrich R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 21440239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of temporal trial-by-trial cuing on early and late stages of auditory processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Lampar A; Lange K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1916-33. PubMed ID: 21590512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prefrontal ERP involved in decision making during visual duration and size discrimination tasks.
Gontier E; Le Dantec C; Paul I; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 118(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 18041612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision processes in temporal discrimination.
Balcı F; Simen P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():157-68. PubMed ID: 24726447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why do temporal generalization gradients change when people make decisions as quickly as possible?
Klapproth F; Wearden JH
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1646-64. PubMed ID: 21563017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: a dual-task approach.
Giesbrecht B; Dixon P; Kingstone A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):695-725. PubMed ID: 11548031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
