128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22197089)
1. Magnesium sulfate as an oral contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging of the small intestine.
Shi H; Liu C; Ding HY; Li CW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e370-5. PubMed ID: 22197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel in Crohn's disease.
Frøkjaer JB; Larsen E; Steffensen E; Nielsen AH; Drewes AM
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):832-42. PubMed ID: 16109660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyethylene glycol solution as an oral contrast agent for MRI of the small bowel in a patient population.
McKenna DA; Roche CJ; Murphy JM; McCarthy PA
Clin Radiol; 2006 Nov; 61(11):966-70. PubMed ID: 17018310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [MR imaging of small bowel with water administration].
Minowa O; Ozaki Y; Sumi Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Feb; 62(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 11905035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI.
Ajaj W; Goehde SC; Schneemann H; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(4):648-53. PubMed ID: 15390230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel biphasic oral contrast solution for enterographic studies.
Algin O; Evrimler S; Ozmen E; Metin MR; Ocakoglu G; Ersoy O; Karaoglanoglu M; Arslan H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 23321835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiological assessment of small bowel obstructions: Value of conventional enteroclysis and dynamic MR-enteroclysis].
Rohr A; Rohr D; Kühbacher T; Schreiber S; Heller M; Reuter M
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1158-64. PubMed ID: 12221576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cine magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel: comparison of different oral contrast media.
Asbach P; Breitwieser C; Diederichs G; Eisele S; Kivelitz D; Taupitz M; Zeitz M; Hamm B; Klessen C
Acta Radiol; 2006 Nov; 47(9):899-906. PubMed ID: 17077038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic evaluation of chronic inflammatory intestinal diseases in children and adolescents: MRI with true-FISP as new gold standard?].
Hohl C; Haage P; Krombach GA; Schmidt T; Ahaus M; Günther RW; Staatz G
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):856-63. PubMed ID: 15902636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and video capsule enteroscopy in diagnosing small-bowel pathology: localization-dependent diagnostic yield.
Böcker U; Dinter D; Litterer C; Hummel F; Knebel P; Franke A; Weiss C; Singer MV; Löhr JM
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 20132082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn's disease: randomized comparison of patient acceptance.
Negaard A; Sandvik L; Berstad AE; Paulsen V; Lygren I; Borthne A; Klow NE
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 18158695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR of the small bowel with a biphasic oral contrast agent (polyethylene glycol): technical aspects and findings in patients affected by Crohn's disease.
Laghi A; Paolantonio P; Iafrate F; Borrelli O; Dito L; Tomei E; Cucchiara S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):18-27. PubMed ID: 12951547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the small and large bowel: effectiveness in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease.
Maccioni F
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 19082651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR imaging oral contrast agent mixed with milk for the small intestine].
Hirohashi S; Hirohashi R; Uchida H; Kitano S; Tanaka M; Matsuo N; Ohishi H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jul; 54(8):784-8. PubMed ID: 8072869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonography of the small bowel after oral administration of anechoic contrast solution.
Pallotta N; Baccini F; Corazziari E
Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9157):985-6. PubMed ID: 10459917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature.
Ekberg O; Stading M; Johansson D; Bülow M; Ekman S; Wendin K
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 20380600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic Resonance in the study of the small bowel.
Laghi A; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):1-15; quiz 16-17. PubMed ID: 12951546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Patient Tolerance and Small-Bowel Distention With a New Small-Bowel Distending Agent for Enterography.
Kolbe AB; Fletcher JG; Froemming AT; Sheedy SP; Koo CW; Pundi K; Bruining DH; Tung J; Harmsen WS; Barlow JM; Fidler JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):994-1002. PubMed ID: 26998661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A combination of small bowel imaging methods: conventional enteroclysis with complementary magnetic resonance enteroclysis.
Akman C; Korman U; Oğüt G; Kuruğoğlu S; Urger E; Ulus S; Esen G; Tasci I
Clin Radiol; 2005 Jul; 60(7):778-86. PubMed ID: 15978889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel distention and lesion detection.
Cronin CG; Lohan DG; Mhuircheartaigh JN; McKenna D; Alhajeri N; Roche C; Murphy JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):502-6. PubMed ID: 18647923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]