228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22198474)
1. Predicting binding affinities of host-guest systems in the SAMPL3 blind challenge: the performance of relative free energy calculations.
König G; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 22198474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thermodynamic integration to predict host-guest binding affinities.
Lawrenz M; Wereszczynski J; Ortiz-Sánchez JM; Nichols SE; McCammon JA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22350568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
Lee J; Tofoleanu F; Pickard FC; König G; Huang J; Damjanović A; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 27677749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
Tofoleanu F; Lee J; Pickard Iv FC; König G; Huang J; Baek M; Seok C; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):107-118. PubMed ID: 27696242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of thermodynamic integration and Bennett acceptance ratio for calculating relative protein-ligand binding free energies.
de Ruiter A; Boresch S; Oostenbrink C
J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(12):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23335287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of hydration free energies for aliphatic and aromatic chloro derivatives using molecular dynamics simulations with the OPLS-AA force field.
Beckstein O; Iorga BI
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):635-45. PubMed ID: 22187140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the fly estimation of host-guest binding free energies using the movable type method: participation in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.
Bansal N; Zheng Z; Cerutti DS; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 27699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest binding affinities: evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields.
Muddana HS; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 22274835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.
Shi Y; Laury ML; Wang Z; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 33140208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of alchemical free energy simulations. I. A practical comparison of the exponential formula, thermodynamic integration, and Bennett's acceptance ratio method.
Bruckner S; Boresch S
J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1303-19. PubMed ID: 21425288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of SAMPL3 host-guest affinities with the binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM).
Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 22354755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficiency of alchemical free energy simulations. II. Improvements for thermodynamic integration.
Bruckner S; Boresch S
J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1320-33. PubMed ID: 21425289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.
Slochower DR; Henriksen NM; Wang LP; Chodera JD; Mobley DL; Gilson MK
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Nov; 15(11):6225-6242. PubMed ID: 31603667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model.
Wickstrom L; Gallicchio E; Chen L; Kurtzman T; Deng N
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Mar; 24(10):6037-6052. PubMed ID: 35212338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy-entropy method using multiscale cell correlation to calculate binding free energies in the SAMPL8 host-guest challenge.
Ali HS; Chakravorty A; Kalayan J; de Visser SP; Henchman RH
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Aug; 35(8):911-921. PubMed ID: 34264476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast free energy estimates from λ-dynamics with bias-updated Gibbs sampling.
Robo MT; Hayes RL; Ding X; Pulawski B; Vilseck JZ
Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8515. PubMed ID: 38129400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches.
Miyamoto S; Kollman PA
Proteins; 1993 Jul; 16(3):226-45. PubMed ID: 8346190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
