These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22198714)

  • 1. Burden of colonoscopy compared to non-cathartic CT-colonography in a colorectal cancer screening programme: randomised controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
    Gut; 2012 Nov; 61(11):1552-9. PubMed ID: 22198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Stoop EM; de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; van Ballegooijen M; Nio CY; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Stoker J; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
    Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22088831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Grazzini G; Borgheresi A; Delsanto S; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Milani S; Pallanti S; Zappa M; Mascalchi M
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2457-2464. PubMed ID: 30402705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed decision-making in colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy or CT-colonography.
    de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop E; Bossuyt P; Fockens P; Thomeer M; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jun; 91(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 23399437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Deutekom M; Fockens P; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; van Ballegooijen M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 10():47. PubMed ID: 20482825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.
    Stoop EM; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; van Leerdam ME
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 107(7):1051-8. PubMed ID: 22918392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial of colonoscopy and CT colonography.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Essink-Bot ML; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Stoker J; Dekker E
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1777-83. PubMed ID: 23211845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.
    Gluecker TM; Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Offord KP; Harris AM; Wilson LA; Ahlquist DA
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 12732696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Carozzi F; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G; Mantellini P
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 36116454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.
    Jensch S; Bipat S; Peringa J; de Vries AH; Heutinck A; Dekker E; Baak LC; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 19626326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
    Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced and Full-Preparation CT Colonography, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Colonoscopy for Population Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial.
    Sali L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Ventura L; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Delsanto S; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Feb; 108(2):. PubMed ID: 26719225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.
    van der Meulen MP; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J; van Ballegooijen M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):901-911. PubMed ID: 29485322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography in patients with screen-detected 6-9 mm polyps.
    Tutein Nolthenius CJ; Boellaard TN; de Haan MC; Nio CY; Thomeer MG; Bipat S; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Essink-Bot ML; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4000-4010. PubMed ID: 27059859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.
    Ghanouni A; Halligan S; Plumb A; Boone D; Wardle J; von Wagner C
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1477-86. PubMed ID: 24817084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk subjects.
    Scott RG; Edwards JT; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Mendelson RM; Forbes GM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1145-51. PubMed ID: 15180739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient burden of colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening.
    Denters MJ; Deutekom M; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Endoscopy; 2013; 45(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23483433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study.
    Edwards JT; Mendelson RM; Fritschi L; Foster NM; Wood C; Murray D; Forbes GM
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 14688402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colon distension, perceived burden and side-effects of CT-colonography for screening using hyoscine butylbromide or glucagon hydrochloride as bowel relaxant.
    de Haan MC; Boellaard TN; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e910-6. PubMed ID: 22683196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme.
    Plumb AA; Ghanouni A; Rees CJ; Hewitson P; Nickerson C; Wright S; Taylor SA; Halligan S; von Wagner C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1052-1063. PubMed ID: 27287477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.