214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22198844)
1. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
Park KH
J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome.
Kehila M; Abouda HS; Sahbi K; Cheour H; Chanoufi MB
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016 May; 9(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 27197935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction.
Kang WS; Park KH; Kim SN; Shin DM; Hong JS; Jung HJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 20205152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
Bueno B; San-Frutos L; Salazar F; Pérez-Medina T; Engels V; Archilla B; Izquierdo F; Bajo J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women.
Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC
BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
