These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22199990)

  • 1. You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.
    Angrist M
    Per Med; 2011 Nov; 8(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 22199990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
    Koplin JJ; Savulescu J; Vears DF
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):11. PubMed ID: 32005225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
    Bredenoord AL; Kroes HY; Cuppen E; Parker M; van Delden JJ
    Trends Genet; 2011 Feb; 27(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 21190750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
    Bredenoord AL; Onland-Moret NC; Van Delden JJ
    Hum Mutat; 2011 Aug; 32(8):861-7. PubMed ID: 21538687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The information of the schizophrenic patient: actuality].
    Palazzolo J; Brousse G; Favre P; Llorca PM
    Encephale; 2005; 31(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15959449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.
    Jamal L; Robinson JO; Christensen KD; Blumenthal-Barby J; Slashinski MJ; Perry DL; Vassy JL; Wycliff J; Green RC; McGuire AL
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 28949844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Pereira S; Oliver Robinson J; McGuire AL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 27329739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidental Findings in Low-Resource Settings.
    Sullivan HK; Berkman BE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 May; 48(3):20-28. PubMed ID: 29806893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives.
    Chan B; Facio FM; Eidem H; Hull SC; Biesecker LG; Berkman BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 22974017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues.
    Hallowell N; Hall A; Alberg C; Zimmern R
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 25038088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings.
    Sabatello M; Appelbaum PS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 44(2):292-308. PubMed ID: 27338605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whole-exome sequencing in pediatrics: parents' considerations toward return of unsolicited findings for their child.
    Cornelis C; Tibben A; Dondorp W; van Haelst M; Bredenoord AL; Knoers N; Düwell M; Bolt I; van Summeren M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1681-1687. PubMed ID: 27460421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disclosure of incidental findings in cancer genomic research: investigators' perceptions on obligations and barriers.
    Kleiderman E; Avard D; Besso A; Ali-Khan S; Sauvageau G; Hébert J
    Clin Genet; 2015 Oct; 88(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 25492269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?
    Steinsbekk KS; Solberg B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Oct; 132(19):2190-3. PubMed ID: 23243670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
    Jelsig AM; Qvist N; Brusgaard K; Ousager LB
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1423-6. PubMed ID: 25604854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The research imperative revisited: considerations for advancing the debate surrounding medical research as moral imperative.
    Wayne K; Glass KC
    Perspect Biol Med; 2010; 53(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 20639606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Return of genetic and genomic research findings: experience of a pediatric biorepository.
    Papaz T; Liston E; Zahavich L; Stavropoulos DJ; Jobling RK; Kim RH; Reuter M; Miron A; Oechslin E; Mondal T; Bergin L; Smythe JF; Altamirano-Diaz L; Lougheed J; Yao R; Akinrinade O; Breckpot J; Mital S
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Nov; 12(1):173. PubMed ID: 31775751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
    Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
    Wynn J; Lewis K; Amendola LM; Bernhardt BA; Biswas S; Joshi M; McMullen C; Scollon S
    BMC Med Genomics; 2018 May; 11(1):45. PubMed ID: 29739461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing.
    Gornick MC; Scherer AM; Sutton EJ; Ryan KA; Exe NL; Li M; Uhlmann WR; Kim SY; Roberts JS; De Vries RG
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Feb; 26(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 27307100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.