BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22200255)

  • 1. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer.
    Kato O; Kawasaki N; Bodri D; Kuroda T; Kawachiya S; Kato K; Takehara Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22200255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
    Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group.
    Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
    Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.
    Shi W; Xue X; Zhang S; Zhao W; Liu S; Zhou H; Wang M; Shi J
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22464083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006.
    Pelkonen S; Koivunen R; Gissler M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Suikkari AM; Hydén-Granskog C; Martikainen H; Tiitinen A; Hartikainen AL
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Apr; 25(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 20124395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
    Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study.
    Ginström Ernstad E; Bergh C; Khatibi A; Källén KB; Westlander G; Nilsson S; Wennerholm UB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):378.e1-378.e10. PubMed ID: 26928152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Better perinatal outcomes following transfer of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos: a population-based study.
    Wang YA; Chapman M; Costello M; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20356898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study.
    Rama Raju GA; Jaya Prakash G; Murali Krishna K; Madan K
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul; 92(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 18692781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
    Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?
    Pinborg A; Henningsen AA; Loft A; Malchau SS; Forman J; Andersen AN
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Mar; 29(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 24413766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
    Kahraman S; Candan ZN
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
    De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers.
    Zhu Q; Wang N; Wang B; Wang Y; Kuang Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 30135993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos.
    Sazonova A; Källen K; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 May; 27(5):1343-50. PubMed ID: 22362926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are perinatal outcomes affected by blastocyst vitrification and warming?
    Barsky M; St Marie P; Rahil T; Markenson GR; Sites CK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):603.e1-603.e5. PubMed ID: 27287684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF.
    Vergouw CG; Kostelijk EH; Doejaaren E; Hompes PG; Lambalk CB; Schats R
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2619-26. PubMed ID: 22791752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.