These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22200289)

  • 1. Sampling artifacts in the determination of particulate sulfate and SO2(g) in the desert Southwest using filter pack samplers.
    Eatough DJ; Lewis LJ; Eatough M; Lewis EA
    Environ Sci Technol; 1995 Mar; 29(3):787-91. PubMed ID: 22200289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and Accuracy in the Determination of Sulfur Oxides, Fluoride, and Spherical Aluminosilicate Fly Ash Particles in Project MOHAVE.
    Eatough NL; Eatough M; Eatough DJ; Joseph JM; Caka FM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1997 Mar; 47(3):455-467. PubMed ID: 29081279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and Accuracy in the Determination of Sulfur Oxides, Fluoride, and Spherical Aluminosilicate Fly Ash Particles in Project MOHAVE.
    Eatough NL; Eatough M; Joseph JM; Caka FM; Lewis L; Eatough DJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 1997 Apr; 47(4):455-467. PubMed ID: 28065152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS).
    Geyh AS; Hering S; Kreisberg N; John W
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Nov; (122):1-22; discussion 23-9. PubMed ID: 15675716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of semivolatile carbonaceous aerosols and its implications: a review.
    Cheng Y; He KB; Duan FK; Zheng M; Ma YL; Tan JH
    Environ Int; 2009 Apr; 35(3):674-81. PubMed ID: 19201473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory and field validation of a combined NO2-SO2 Radiello passive sampler.
    Swaans W; Goelen E; De Fré R; Damen E; Van Avermaet P; Roekens E; Keppens V
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1231-40. PubMed ID: 17968450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous determination of atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen oxides using a battery-operated portable filter pack sampler.
    Watanabe M; Takamatsu T; Koshikawa MK; Sakamoto K; Inubushi K
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 16395475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Particulate carbon measurements in California's San Joaquin Valley.
    Chow JC; Watson JG; Lowenthal DH; Chen LW; Magliano KL
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jan; 62(3):337-48. PubMed ID: 15990153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composition of diesel exhaust with particular reference to particle bound organics including formation of artifacts.
    Lies KH; Hartung A; Postulka A; Gring H; Schulze J
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1986; 13():65-82. PubMed ID: 2435507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peak exposures in aluminium potrooms: instrument development and field calibration.
    Carter SR; Seixas NS; Thompson ML; Yost MG
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Nov; 6(11):932-7. PubMed ID: 15536509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Method for concentration determination of mineral-oil fog in the air of workplace].
    Xu M; Zhang YZ; Liu SF
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 May; 26(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 18727870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collection efficiency of particulate and xenon sampling in the international monitoring system of the comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
    Medici F; Wernsperger B; Valmari T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2004; 61(2-3):219-24. PubMed ID: 15177348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaseous and particulate air pollution in the Lanzhou Valley, China.
    Ta W; Wang T; Xiao H; Zhu X; Xiao Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Mar; 320(2-3):163-76. PubMed ID: 15016505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Portable XRF analysis of occupational air filter samples from different workplaces using different samplers: final results, summary and conclusions.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Bartley DL; Slaven JE; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1263-70. PubMed ID: 17968454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sampling and analysis of carbon in diesel exhaust particulates--an international comparison.
    Hebisch R; Dabill D; Dahmann D; Diebold F; Geiregat N; Grosjean R; Mattenklott M; Perret V; Guillemin M
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2003 Mar; 76(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 12733086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thoracic size-selective sampling of fibres: performance of four types of thoracic sampler in laboratory tests.
    Jones AD; Aitken RJ; Fabriès JF; Kauffer E; Liden G; Maynard A; Riediger G; Sahle W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Aug; 49(6):481-92. PubMed ID: 15790615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.