456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22200867)
1. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A trial-based assessment of the cost-utility of bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Goulart B; Ramsey S
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):836-45. PubMed ID: 21914503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel for HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: an economic evaluation.
Dedes KJ; Matter-Walstra K; Schwenkglenks M; Pestalozzi BC; Fink D; Brauchli P; Szucs TD
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(8):1397-406. PubMed ID: 19147344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Markov model and cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Refaat T; Choi M; Gaber G; Kiel K; Mehta M; Gradishar W; Small W
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 37(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 23388565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cohn DE; Kim KH; Resnick KE; O'Malley DM; Straughn JM
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 29(10):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21383297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of antiangiogenesis therapy using bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.
Minion LE; Bai J; Monk BJ; Robin Keller L; Ramez EN; Forde GK; Chan JK; Tewari KS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):490-6. PubMed ID: 25766118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.
Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M
Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of combination versus sequential docetaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Pokrzywinski R; Revicki D; Higgins RV; Nycum LR; Kohler MF; Berchuck A; Myers ER; Secord AA
Cancer; 2012 Jan; 118(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 21598242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost effectiveness study of eribulin versus standard single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy for women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.
Lopes G; Glück S; Avancha K; Montero AJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jan; 137(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 23143283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-utility analysis of bevacizumab versus ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a Markov model.
Patel JJ; Mendes MA; Bounthavong M; Christopher ML; Boggie D; Morreale AP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 20846318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in specialist oncology centers in France.
Petitjean A; Smith-Palmer J; Valentine W; Tehard B; Roze S
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 30744578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.
Garrison LP; Lubeck D; Lalla D; Paton V; Dueck A; Perez EA
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 17592827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incremental cost-effectiveness of the pre- and post-bevacizumab eras of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy in British Columbia, Canada.
Hedden L; Kennecke H; Villa D; Johnston K; Speers C; Kovacic L; Renouf DJ; Peacock S
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(13):1969-76. PubMed ID: 22325838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States.
Garrison LP; Babigumira J; Tournier C; Goertz HP; Lubinga SJ; Perez EA
Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 30975391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Kovic B; Xie F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(20):2296-302. PubMed ID: 26014296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Delea TE; Karnon J; Smith RE; Johnston SR; Brandman J; Sung JC; Gross PE
Am J Manag Care; 2006 Jul; 12(7):374-86. PubMed ID: 16834524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) for node-positive breast cancer: modeling the downstream effects.
Au HJ; Golmohammadi K; Younis T; Verma S; Chia S; Fassbender K; Jacobs P
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Apr; 114(3):579-87. PubMed ID: 18443903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1334-49. PubMed ID: 22578308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
