These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22201468)

  • 1. Tagging multiple emotional stimuli: negative valence has little benefit.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):785-803. PubMed ID: 22201468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored?
    Blagrove E; Watson DG
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Barratt D; Bundesen C
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(7):1223-37. PubMed ID: 22416914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative triangles: simple geometric shapes convey emotional valence.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E; Evans C; Moore L
    Emotion; 2012 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21787078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not just another face in the crowd: detecting emotional schematic faces during continuous flash suppression.
    Stein T; Sterzer P
    Emotion; 2012 Oct; 12(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 22309728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The combined effect of gaze direction and facial expression on cueing spatial attention.
    Pecchinenda A; Pes M; Ferlazzo F; Zoccolotti P
    Emotion; 2008 Oct; 8(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 18837612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysics of emotion: the QUEST for emotional attention.
    Roesch EB; Sander D; Mumenthaler C; Kerzel D; Scherer KR
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):4.1-9. PubMed ID: 20377281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search for schematic emotional faces risks perceptual confound.
    Mak-Fan KM; Thompson WF; Green RE
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jun; 25(4):573-84. PubMed ID: 21547761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valence specific laterality effects in free viewing conditions: the role of expectancy and gender of image.
    Stafford LD; Brandaro N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 20934796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional triangles: a test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E; Selwood S
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Nov; 25(7):1149-64. PubMed ID: 21432646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional context influences access of visual stimuli to anxious individuals' awareness.
    Ruderman L; Lamy D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):900-14. PubMed ID: 22342536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amygdala responses to positively and negatively valenced baby faces in healthy female volunteers: influences of individual differences in harm avoidance.
    Baeken C; De Raedt R; Ramsey N; Van Schuerbeek P; Hermes D; Bossuyt A; Leyman L; Vanderhasselt MA; De Mey J; Luypaert R
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1296():94-103. PubMed ID: 19679112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic processing of valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli: evidence from an ERP study.
    Meng X; Yuan J; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Oct; 464(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 19720111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does it matter where we meet? The role of emotional context in evaluative first impressions.
    Koji S; Fernandes M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 20565176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early visual tagging: effects of target-distractor similarity and old age on search, subitization, and counting.
    Watson DG; Maylor EA; Allen GE; Bruce LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):549-69. PubMed ID: 17563221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does ignoring lead to worse evaluations? A new explanation of the stimulus devaluation effect.
    Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 21623485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.
    Maxwell JS; Shackman AJ; Davidson RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1386-95. PubMed ID: 16197692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid acquisition of emotional information and attentional bias in anxious children.
    Fulcher EP; Mathews A; Hammerl M
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2008 Sep; 39(3):321-39. PubMed ID: 17884011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.