138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22202542)
1. Is ultrasound imaging inferior to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal mass size?
Mucksavage P; Ramchandani P; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 22202542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI and CT characteristics of successfully ablated renal masses: Imaging surveillance after radiofrequency ablation.
Davenport MS; Caoili EM; Cohan RH; Ellis JH; Higgins EJ; Willatt J; Fox GA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1571-8. PubMed ID: 19457820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indeterminate liver and renal lesions: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in providing a definitive diagnosis and impact on recommendations for additional imaging.
Margolis NE; Shaver CM; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):882-6. PubMed ID: 24270109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of imaging modalities in pediatric thyroglossal duct cysts.
Huoh KC; Durr ML; Meyer AK; Rosbe KW
Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1405-8. PubMed ID: 22460362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative staging of rectal tumors: comparison of endorectal ultrasound, hydro-CT, and high-resolution endorectal MRI.
Dinter DJ; Hofheinz RD; Hartel M; Kaehler GF; Neff W; Diehl SJ
Onkologie; 2008 May; 31(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 18497511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Staging and follow-up of renal cell carcinoma].
Rouvière O; Brunereau L; Lyonnet D; Rouleau P
J Radiol; 2002 Jun; 83(6 Pt 2):805-22, discussion 823-4. PubMed ID: 12218854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multidetector computed tomography vs magnetic resonance imaging for defining the upper limit of tumour thrombus in renal cell carcinoma: a study and review.
Lawrentschuk N; Gani J; Riordan R; Esler S; Bolton DM
BJU Int; 2005 Aug; 96(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 16042716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Downstaging chemotherapy and alteration in the classic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging signs of vascular involvement in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignant tumors: influence on patient selection for surgery.
Donahue TR; Isacoff WH; Hines OJ; Tomlinson JS; Farrell JJ; Bhat YM; Garon E; Clerkin B; Reber HA
Arch Surg; 2011 Jul; 146(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 21768431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection.
Bhattacharjya S; Bhattacharjya T; Baber S; Tibballs JM; Watkinson AF; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1361-9. PubMed ID: 15376205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.
Kauhanen SP; Komar G; Seppänen MP; Dean KI; Minn HR; Kajander SA; Rinta-Kiikka I; Alanen K; Borra RJ; Puolakkainen PA; Nuutila P; Ovaska JT
Ann Surg; 2009 Dec; 250(6):957-63. PubMed ID: 19687736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of renal masses at 0.02 tesla.
Ekelund L; Hietala SO; Ljungberg B; Lotz H; Wickman G
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 2964847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The staging of renal-cell carcinomas in MRT and CT--a prospective histologically controlled study].
Hallscheidt P; Stolte E; Roeren T; Pomer S; Drehmer I; Kauffmann GW
Rofo; 1998 Feb; 168(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 9519049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in Renal Tumor Size Measurements for Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Patients on Active Surveillance.
Khan I; Beksac AT; Paulucci DJ; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1275-1278. PubMed ID: 28799884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of the mediastinum: applications for thoracic surgery.
Shaham D; Skilakaki MG; Goitein O
Thorac Surg Clin; 2004 Feb; 14(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 15382306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characterization and staging of renal tumors: significance of MRI diagnostics].
Kalinka A; Gerlach A; Arlart IP; Günes N; Hauser TK; Würstlin S; Bosse A
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16508837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodal staging of rectal cancer: high-resolution pelvic MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDGPET/CT.
Kim DJ; Kim JH; Ryu YH; Jeon TJ; Yu JS; Chung JJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 21926843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and 11C-metomidate positron emission tomography for evaluation of adrenal incidentalomas.
Hennings J; Hellman P; Ahlström H; Sundin A
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 18082990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
