These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22203270)

  • 1. The validation of screening tests: meet the new screen same as the old screen?
    Gambino B
    J Gambl Stud; 2012 Dec; 28(4):573-605. PubMed ID: 22203270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test Performance Variation Between Settings and Populations.
    Gambino B
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Dec; 34(4):1085-1108. PubMed ID: 29119356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting criterion thresholds for estimating prevalence: what is being validated?
    Gambino B
    J Gambl Stud; 2014 Sep; 30(3):577-607. PubMed ID: 23526052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Test Evaluation: Methods and Challenges.
    Gambino B
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Dec; 34(4):1109-1138. PubMed ID: 29368061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Consumption Screen for Problem Gambling (CSPG).
    Rockloff MJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2012 Jun; 28(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 21830133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Hungarian version of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Farkas J; Kun B; Kökönyei G; Eisinger A; Magi A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2013; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 24142293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Victorian Gambling Screen: reliability and validation in a clinical population.
    Tolchard B; Battersby MW
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 20035440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of the Gambling Pathways Questionnaire (GPQ).
    Nower L; Blaszczynski A
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2017 Feb; 31(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 27936817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for problem gambling within mental health services: a comparison of the classification accuracy of brief instruments.
    Dowling NA; Merkouris SS; Manning V; Volberg R; Lee SJ; Rodda SN; Lubman DI
    Addiction; 2018 Jun; 113(6):1088-1104. PubMed ID: 29274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a one item screen for problem gambling.
    Rockloff MJ; Ehrich J; Themessl-Huber M; Evans LG
    J Gambl Stud; 2011 Dec; 27(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 21210191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].
    Jaussent S; Labarère J; Boyer JP; François P
    Encephale; 2004; 30(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 15627048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
    de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review evaluating screening instruments for gambling disorder finds lack of adequate evidence.
    Otto JL; Smolenski DJ; Garvey Wilson AL; Evatt DP; Campbell MS; Beech EH; Workman DE; Morgan RL; O'Gallagher K; Belsher BE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 120():86-93. PubMed ID: 31917356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic accuracy of brief screening instruments for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dowling NA; Merkouris SS; Dias S; Rodda SN; Manning V; Youssef GJ; Lubman DI; Volberg RA
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2019 Dec; 74():101784. PubMed ID: 31759246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spanish validation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index: A confirmatory factor analysis with sports bettors.
    Lopez-Gonzalez H; Estévez A; Griffiths MD
    J Behav Addict; 2018 Sep; 7(3):814-820. PubMed ID: 30264603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of Gambling Problems in Primary Care: Properties of the NODS-CLiP Screening Tool.
    Cowlishaw S; McCambridge J; Kessler D
    J Addict Med; 2018; 12(6):442-446. PubMed ID: 29944480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the problem gambling severity index.
    So R; Matsushita S; Kishimoto S; Furukawa TA
    Addict Behav; 2019 Nov; 98():105987. PubMed ID: 31415969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland.
    Castrén S; Grainger M; Lahti T; Alho H; Salonen AH
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2015 Mar; 10():9. PubMed ID: 25879923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary adaptation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index for Indigenous Australians: internal reliability and construct validity.
    Bertossa S; Harvey P; Smith D; Chong A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2014 Aug; 38(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 25091075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An item response theory analysis of the Problem Gambling Severity Index.
    Sharp C; Steinberg L; Yaroslavsky I; Hofmeyr A; Dellis A; Ross D; Kincaid H
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21856717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.