217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22203924)
1. Sonoelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation.
Gheonea IA; Donoiu L; Camen D; Popescu FC; Bondari S
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(4):1209-14. PubMed ID: 22203924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation.
Schaefer FK; Heer I; Schaefer PJ; Mundhenke C; Osterholz S; Order BM; Hofheinz N; Hedderich J; Heller M; Jonat W; Schreer I
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 19773141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience.
Parajuly SS; Lan PY; Yun MB; Gang YZ; Hua Z
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1447-52. PubMed ID: 22799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Lee YS; Ng FC; Wan CM; Fook-Chong SM; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Clin Radiol; 2010 Nov; 65(11):887-94. PubMed ID: 20933643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Yoon JH; Kim MH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):730-6. PubMed ID: 21343520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of ultrasound elastography in detecting small breast tumors.
Fu LN; Wang Y; Wang Y; Huang YH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Aug; 124(15):2384-6. PubMed ID: 21933573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions.
Zhang Y; Zhao CK; Li XL; He YP; Ren WW; Zou CP; Du YW; Xu HX
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7807. PubMed ID: 28798325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slip imaging: reducing ambiguity in breast lesion assessment.
Kadour MJ; Adams R; English R; Parulekar V; Christopher S; Noble JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2027-35. PubMed ID: 21030141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elastography for breast cancer diagnosis: a useful tool for small and BI-RADS 4 lesions.
Liu XJ; Zhu Y; Liu PF; Xu YL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10739-43. PubMed ID: 25605168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography--a clinical approach.
Tan SM; Teh HS; Mancer JF; Poh WT
Breast; 2008 Jun; 17(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 18054231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions.
Zhu QL; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Liu H; Sun Q; Dai Q; Chen X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1232-8. PubMed ID: 18359145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
