186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22204773)
21. Biomechanical investigation of different internal fixations in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Spahn G; Mückley T; Kahl E; Hofmann GO
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 16337721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia--early results in 92 cases.
Staubli AE; De Simoni C; Babst R; Lobenhoffer P
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B55-62. PubMed ID: 14580986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computational comparison of different plating strategies in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with lateral hinge fractures.
Chen YN; Chuang CH; Yang TH; Chang CW; Li CT; Chang CJ; Chang CH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep; 15(1):409. PubMed ID: 32928260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Finite element analysis of the three different posterior malleolus fixation strategies in relation to different fracture sizes.
Anwar A; Lv D; Zhao Z; Zhang Z; Lu M; Nazir MU; Qasim W
Injury; 2017 Apr; 48(4):825-832. PubMed ID: 28279427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical investigation of the type and configuration of screws used in high tibial osteotomy with titanium locking plate and screw fixation.
Chen YN; Chang CW; Li CT; Chen CH; Chung CR; Chang CH; Peng YT
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 30691494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of Puddu and TomoFix plates for medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
Said E; Ahmed AM; Addosooki A; Attya HA; Awad AK; Ahmed EH; Tammam H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Feb; ():103845. PubMed ID: 38403264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multi-objective design optimization of high tibial osteotomy for improvement of biomechanical effect by using finite element analysis.
Koh YG; Son J; Kim HJ; Kwon SK; Kwon OR; Kim HJ; Kang KT
J Orthop Res; 2018 Nov; 36(11):2956-2965. PubMed ID: 29917265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of valgus medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on articular cartilage pressure of the knee: a biomechanical study.
Agneskirchner JD; Hurschler C; Wrann CD; Lobenhoffer P
Arthroscopy; 2007 Aug; 23(8):852-61. PubMed ID: 17681207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High tibial valgus osteotomy using the Tomofix plate--medium-term results in young patients.
Zaki SH; Rae PJ
Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Jun; 75(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 19681323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical evaluation of high tibial osteotomy plate with internal support block using finite element analysis.
Yang JC; Lin KY; Lin HH; Lee OK
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247412. PubMed ID: 33630875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical comparison of two different locking plates for open wedge high tibial osteotomy.
van Egmond N; Janssen D; Hannink G; Verdonschot N; van Kampen A
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Jan; 23(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 29032860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Complications in high tibial (medial opening wedge) osteotomy.
Spahn G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Dec; 124(10):649-53. PubMed ID: 14520581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical superiority of plate fixation for proximal tibial osteotomy.
Hartford JM; Hester P; Watt PM; Hamilton D; Rohmiller M; Pienkowski D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jul; (412):125-30. PubMed ID: 12838062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Numerical comparative study of five currently used implants for high tibial osteotomy: realistic loading including muscle forces versus simplified experimental loading.
Diffo Kaze A; Maas S; Kedziora S; Belsey J; Haupert A; Wolf C; Hoffmann A; Pape D
J Exp Orthop; 2018 Aug; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 30091026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of plate length, fibula integrity and plate placement on tibial shaft fixation stability: a finite element study.
Cao Y; Zhang Y; Huang L; Huang X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):52. PubMed ID: 30767784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee with varus deformity].
Baur W; Hönle W; Schuh A
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2005 Sep; 17(3):326-44. PubMed ID: 16132254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
