303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22204869)
1. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.
Setoyama Y; Yamazaki Y; Namayama K
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e122. PubMed ID: 22204869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups.
van Uden-Kraan CF; Drossaert CH; Taal E; Seydel ER; van de Laar MA
J Med Internet Res; 2008 Jun; 10(2):e18. PubMed ID: 18653442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing support to breast cancer patients from online communities and face-to-face support groups.
Setoyama Y; Yamazaki Y; Nakayama K
Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Nov; 85(2):e95-100. PubMed ID: 21159482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of lurkers and posters within infertility online support groups.
Malik SH; Coulson NS
Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Oct; 29(10):564-73. PubMed ID: 21709546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.
Batenburg A; Das E
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Nov; 16(11):e256. PubMed ID: 25474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emotional coping differences among breast cancer patients from an online support group: a cross-sectional study.
Batenburg A; Das E
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Feb; 16(2):e28. PubMed ID: 24499687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: posters, lurkers, and nonusers.
Han JY; Kim JH; Yoon HJ; Shim M; McTavish FM; Gustafson DH
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(3):356-71. PubMed ID: 22085215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer support from online community on the internet among patients with breast cancer in Japan.
Setoyama Y; Nakayama K; Yamazaki Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 146():886. PubMed ID: 19593035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of Engagement With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Online Support Groups: Comparing Posters and Lurkers.
Coulson N
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2015; 38(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 26166421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lurking as an active participation process: a longitudinal investigation of engagement with an online cancer support group.
Han JY; Hou J; Kim E; Gustafson DH
Health Commun; 2014; 29(9):911-23. PubMed ID: 24345206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China.
Chen Z; Zhang C; Fan G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32722561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the role of online support from the perspective of facilitators of face-to-face support groups? A multi-method study of the use of breast cancer online communities.
Bender JL; Katz J; Ferris LE; Jadad AR
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 23928354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Giving and receiving peer advice in an online breast cancer support group.
Sillence E
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Jun; 16(6):480-5. PubMed ID: 23659724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: an exploration of first time posts from 2562 members.
Selby P; van Mierlo T; Voci SC; Parent D; Cunningham JA
J Med Internet Res; 2010 Aug; 12(3):e34. PubMed ID: 20719739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.
Naslund JA; Aschbrenner KA; Marsch LA; Bartels SJ
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 26744309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Online Support Communities for Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders: Online Survey of Users' Experiences.
Perkins V; Coulson NS; Davies EB
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e18099. PubMed ID: 33141089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons Learned for Online Health Community Moderator Roles: A Mixed-Methods Study of Moderators Resigning From WebMD Communities.
Huh J; Marmor R; Jiang X
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e247. PubMed ID: 27608721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preferences for models of peer support in the digital era: A cross-sectional survey of people with cancer.
Boyes A; Turon H; Hall A; Watson R; Proietto A; Sanson-Fisher R
Psychooncology; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2148-2154. PubMed ID: 29808504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.
Lobban F; Akers N; Appelbe D; Iraci Capuccinello R; Chapman L; Collinge L; Dodd S; Flowers S; Hollingsworth B; Honary M; Johnson S; Jones SH; Mateus C; Mezes B; Murray E; Panagaki K; Rainford N; Robinson H; Rosala-Hallas A; Sellwood W; Walker A; Williamson PR
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jun; 24(32):1-142. PubMed ID: 32608353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online activity and participation in treatment affects the perceived efficacy of social health networks among patients with chronic illness.
Magnezi R; Bergman YS; Grosberg D
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jan; 16(1):e12. PubMed ID: 24413148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
