BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22206627)

  • 1. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading.
    Gershman B; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1033-7. PubMed ID: 22206627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
    Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of PSA velocity in predicting pathologic upgrade for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Krane LS; Menon M; Kaul SA; Siddiqui SA; Wambi C; Peabody JO; Agarwal PK
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 19576796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
    Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
    King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M; Nava L; Lughezzani G; Larcher A; Scattoni V; Gadda GM; Bini V; Cestari A; Buffi NM; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 22078333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
    Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
    J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
    Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The proportion of free PSA and upgrading of biopsy Gleason score after radical prostatectomy.
    Visapää H; Hotakainen K; Lundin J; Ala-Opas M; Stenman UH
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 20299777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
    Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Risk factors of ISUP Modified Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy].
    Li XD; Qu GY; Xu N; Xue XY; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Li JF; Cai H; Lin YZ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 May; 22(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 27416665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.