162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2220670)
1. Safety and cost-containment data that advocate abbreviated pretransfusion testing.
Cordle DG; Strauss RG; Snyder EL; Floss AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Oct; 94(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 2220670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective study to determine the safety of omitting the antiglobulin crossmatch from pretransfusion testing.
Heddle NM; O'Hoski P; Singer J; McBride JA; Ali MA; Kelton JG
Br J Haematol; 1992 Aug; 81(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 1390245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the indirect antiglobulin crossmatch justified?
Peterson DM; Roxby DJ; Seshadri R
Pathology; 1987 Apr; 19(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 3502613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative utility of the autologous control and the antiglobulin test phase of the crossmatch.
Perkins JT; Arruza M; Fong K; Sosler SD; Saporito C
Transfusion; 1990; 30(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 2378021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of clinically significant antibodies in patients undergoing elective surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A case for the type and screen method.
Obi EI; Pughikumo OC; Korubo KI; Ejele AO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 32031086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test (autocontrol) in pretransfusion testing revisited.
Judd WJ; Barnes BA; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Averill DB; Butch SH
Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3705135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.
Kuriyan M; Fox E
Vox Sang; 2000; 78(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 10765147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The risk of an overt hemolytic transfusion reaction following the use of an immediate spin crossmatch.
Shulman IA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Apr; 114(4):412-4. PubMed ID: 2322101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a manual hexadimethrine bromide-antiglobulin test with saline- and albumin-antiglobulin tests for pretransfusion testing.
Mintz PD; Anderson G
Transfusion; 1987; 27(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 3824470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.
Butch SH; Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Stoe M; Oberman HA
Transfusion; 1994 Feb; 34(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 8310478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfusion Preparedness in the Labor and Delivery Unit: An Initiative to Improve Safety and Cost.
Benson AE; Metcalf RA; Cail K; Rollins MD; Warrick CM; Falkner D; Clark EAS; Nelson RE; Einerson BD
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 138(5):788-794. PubMed ID: 34619726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicenter prospective observational study on the use of type and screen method versus conventional type and crossmatch policy for pre-transfusion testing in the Indian population.
Mathur A; Jindal A; Tiwari AK; Bhuyan D; Jagannathan L; Sawant RB; Basu S; Reddy M; Datta SS
Immunohematology; 2022 Sep; 38(3):100-105. PubMed ID: 36190198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of preadmission blood samples for pretransfusion testing in elective surgery.
Marosszeky S; McDonald S; Sutherland J; Haysom H; Haeusler M; Sellings C; Metz J; McGrath KM
Transfusion; 1997 Sep; 37(9):910-2. PubMed ID: 9308636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reappraisal of pre-transfusion testing procedures in a hospital blood bank.
Lown JA; Barr AL; Jackson JM
Pathology; 1985 Jul; 17(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 4069768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.
Anu KD; Pahuja S; Sharma G
Asian J Transfus Sci; 2022; 16(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 36199420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First Indian study to establish safety of immediate-spin crossmatch for red blood cell transfusion in antibody screen-negative recipients.
Tiwari AK; Aggarwal G; Dara RC; Arora D; Gupta GK; Raina V
Asian J Transfus Sci; 2017; 11(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 28316439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A proposal for compatibility testing incorporating the manual hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene) test.
Steane EA; Steane SM; Montgomery SR; Pearson JR
Transfusion; 1985; 25(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 4071598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pretransfusion blood group serology. Limited value of the antiglobulin phase of the crossmatch when a careful screening test for unexpected antibodies is performed.
Heistø H
Transfusion; 1979; 19(6):761-3. PubMed ID: 118557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
