These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2220670)

  • 61. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Safety in transfusion practice. Is it safe to eliminate the major crossmatch for selected patients?
    Shulman IA; Kent D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 2919957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Type and Screen: immunohematological safety is ensured and costs are lowered].
    Riedler GF
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Nov; 126(45):1946-51. PubMed ID: 8992623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The efficacy of performing red cell elution studies in the pretransfusion testing of patients with positive direct antiglobulin tests.
    Stec N; Shirey RS; Smith B; Kickler TS; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 3705136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Performance characteristics of two automated solid-phase red cell adherence systems for pretransfusion antibody screening: a cautionary tale.
    Quillen K; Caron J; Murphy K
    Immunohematology; 2012; 28(4):137-9. PubMed ID: 23421544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Provision of phenotype-matched blood units: no need for pre-transfusion antibody screening.
    Lau FY; Wong R; Chan NP; Chui CH; Ng E; Ng MH; Cheng G
    Haematologica; 2001 Jul; 86(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 11454530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Is a room-temperature crossmatch necessary for the detection of ABO errors?
    Trudeau LR; Judd WJ; Butch SH; Oberman HA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 6679378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of heel stick sample with placental blood sample for pretransfusion testing.
    Aysola AE; Duque MA; Williams P; Alissa R
    Transfusion; 2018 Sep; 58(9):2227-2231. PubMed ID: 30153354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. RISK OF RED BLOOD CELL ALLOIMMUNISATION IN RWANDA: ASSESSMENT OF PRETRANSFUSION CROSSMATCH TECHNIQUES USED IN DISTRICT HOSPITALS.
    Ndahimana E; Gothot A; Gérard C; Senyana F; R'Zik S; Mukabayire O; Mutesa L
    East Afr Med J; 2013 Apr; 90(4):124-9. PubMed ID: 26866096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion.
    Makarovska-Bojadzieva T; Blagoevska M; Kolevski P; Kostovska S
    Prilozi; 2009 Jul; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 19736535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of a rapid agglutination method for detection of equine red cell surface antigens (Ca and Aa) as part of pretransfusion testing.
    Owens SD; Snipes J; Magdesian KG; Christopher MM
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18366544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Performance and reliability of a benchtop automated instrument for transfusion testing: a comparative multicenter clinical study in the US population.
    Roback JD; Denomme GA; Billingsley K; Bensing K; Parsons JC; McDonough WC
    Transfusion; 2019 Nov; 59(11):3511-3518. PubMed ID: 31532543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effect of sample storage on blood crossmatching in horses.
    Harris M; Nolen-Walston R; Ashton W; May M; Jackson K; Boston R
    J Vet Intern Med; 2012; 26(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 22458345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Anti-A antibody transfused with non-group-specific platelets. Serological abnormalities.
    Thomas L; Tuscany FL; Wilner GD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1981 Jan; 105(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 6893913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Retrospective evaluation of flow cytometry as a platelet crossmatching procedure.
    Gates K; MacPherson BR
    Cytometry; 1994 Sep; 18(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 7813332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A rational approach to crossmatching blood for elective surgery.
    Dodds AJ; Pun A; Isbister JP; Ting A; Klarkowski D; Concannon AJ; Biggs JC
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1983 Feb; 11(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 6407355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A renewed understanding of anti-human globulin reagents: interference constraints using an optimization method in pretransfusion compatibility tests.
    Wang SS; Zhang H; Qu L; Zhao Z; Li L
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Mar; 35(3):e23695. PubMed ID: 33543811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. False-negative compatible antiglobulin crossmatches in samples with alloantibodies to cognate red blood cell antigens.
    Nixon CP; Krohto SL; Sweeney JD
    Transfusion; 2018 Aug; 58(8):2022-2026. PubMed ID: 29687886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Incidence of incompatible crossmatch results in dogs admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital with no history of prior red blood cell transfusion.
    Odunayo A; Garraway K; Rohrbach BW; Rainey A; Stokes J
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2017 Feb; 250(3):303-308. PubMed ID: 28117642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Critical analysis of the routine use of the direct antiglobulin test in 22,517 cross-matching tests].
    López J; Fernández Villalta MJ; de la Calle C; Biurrum M; Gómez-Reino F; Fernández-Rañada JM
    Sangre (Barc); 1990 Feb; 35(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 2333579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.