These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2220670)

  • 81. Successful transfusion of antigen positive blood to alloimmunised patients using a monocyte monolayer assay.
    Noumsi GT; Billingsley KL; Moulds JM
    Transfus Med; 2015 Apr; 25(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 25828731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Safety of the abbreviated cross-match in association with sensitive serum screening.
    Dodsworth H
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1989; 11(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 2591155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [Changes in the structure and clinical significance of the positive results of pretransfusion testing during the switching from tube test agglutination to gel microcolumn technique].
    Petrusić-Kafedzić A; Ivanković Z; Ekinović S; Hutinović A; Ibrahimagić-Seper L
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2010 Aug; 7(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 21258307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Transfusion Medicine: An Update on Antigens, Antibodies and Serologic Testing in Dogs and Cats.
    Zaremba R; Brooks A; Thomovsky E
    Top Companion Anim Med; 2019 Mar; 34():36-46. PubMed ID: 30808496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Effect of donor blood storage on gel column crossmatch in dogs.
    Thomas-Hollands A; Hess RS; Weinstein NM; Marryott K; Fromm S; Chappini NA; Callan MB
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2023 Mar; 52(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 36224702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. The efficacy of type and screen to reduce unnecessary cross matches for obstetric patients.
    Ness PM; Rosche ME; Barrasso C; Luff RD; Johnson JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 140(6):661-4. PubMed ID: 7258239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Pre- and Post-Transfusion Alloimmunization in Dogs Characterized by 2 Antiglobulin-Enhanced Cross-match Tests.
    Goy-Thollot I; Giger U; Boisvineau C; Perrin R; Guidetti M; Chaprier B; Barthélemy A; Pouzot-Nevoret C; Canard B
    J Vet Intern Med; 2017 Sep; 31(5):1420-1429. PubMed ID: 28804957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Cost and quality in the use of blood bank services for normal deliveries, cesarean sections, and hysterectomies.
    Palmer RH; Kane JG; Churchill WH; Goldman L; Komaroff AL
    JAMA; 1986 Jul; 256(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 3723706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The antiglobulin phase of the crossmatch.
    Mayer K
    Transfusion; 1982; 22(5):399-400. PubMed ID: 7123638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays.
    McWilliams B; Yazer MH; Cramer J; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH
    Transfusion; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2139-44; quiz 2145. PubMed ID: 22348700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Comparison of platelet antibody screen, crossmatching and HLA antibody testing in patients refractory to platelet transfusions.
    Chapman JM; Wendt L; Knudson CM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2023 Jun; 62(3):103622. PubMed ID: 36535829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. A solid phase and microtiter plate hemagglutination method for pretransfusion compatibility testing.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Rumsey DH; Novak SC
    Haematologia (Budap); 2000; 30(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 11128107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Cost analysis of routine laboratory testing in blood centers.
    Kline LM; Friedman LI; Severns ML
    Transfusion; 1986; 26(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 3705137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. A novel approach to bedside pretransfusion identity check of blood and its components: the Sandesh Positive-Negative protocol.
    Udupi S; Puri K
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2020 Jun; 73(3):232-238. PubMed ID: 31795620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods.
    Bunker ML; Thomas CL; Geyer SJ
    Transfusion; 2001 May; 41(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 11346697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Modified stall-side crossmatch for transfusions in horses.
    Casenave P; Leclere M; Beauchamp G; Blais MC
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Jul; 33(4):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 31102487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. [The type and screen method of blood requisition in General Hospital Zrenjanin].
    Tesić I; Velisavljev D; Martinov D
    Med Pregl; 2013; 66(1-2):58-63. PubMed ID: 23534302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Type and hold system for better blood utilization.
    Huang ST; Lair J; Floyd DM; Cole GW
    Transfusion; 1980; 20(6):725-8. PubMed ID: 6776668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Type and screen for cesarean section: a prudent alternative.
    Reisner LS
    Anesthesiology; 1983 May; 58(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 6838004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Agreement of stall-side and laboratory major crossmatch tests with the reference standard method in horses.
    Fenn MS; Bortsie-Aryee AD; Perkins GA; Mann S; Tomlinson JE; Wood EM; Mix SE; Stokol T
    J Vet Intern Med; 2020 Mar; 34(2):941-948. PubMed ID: 32017276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.