77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22206908)
1. Automation of clip localization in Digital Tomosynthesis for setup of breast cancer patients.
Ng SK; Lyatskaya Y; Stsepankou D; Hesser J; Bellon JR; Wong JS; Zygmanski P
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22206908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Balancing dose and image registration accuracy for cone beam tomosynthesis (CBTS) for breast patient setup.
Winey BA; Zygmanski P; Cormack RA; Lyatskaya Y
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4414-23. PubMed ID: 20879600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal parameters for clinical implementation of breast cancer patient setup using Varian DTS software.
Ng SK; Zygmanski P; Jeung A; Mostafavi H; Hesser J; Bellon JR; Wong JS; Lyatskaya Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 May; 13(3):3752. PubMed ID: 22584175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of three types of reference image data for external beam radiotherapy target localization using digital tomosynthesis (DTS).
Godfrey DJ; Ren L; Yan H; Wu Q; Yoo S; Oldham M; Yin FF
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3374-84. PubMed ID: 17879800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of clip localization for different kilovoltage imaging modalities as applied to partial breast irradiation setup.
Buehler A; Ng SK; Lyatskaya Y; Stsepankou D; Hesser J; Zygmanski P
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):821-34. PubMed ID: 19378743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical use of the extended no action level (eNAL) correction protocol for breast cancer patients with implanted surgical clips.
Penninkhof J; Quint S; Baaijens M; Heijmen B; Dirkx M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):1031-7. PubMed ID: 21420248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Actual target coverage after setup verification using surgical clips compared with external skin markers in postoperative breast cancer radiation therapy.
van der Salm A; Murrer L; Steenbakkers I; Houben R; Boersma LJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(6):e369-e376. PubMed ID: 28666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image guidance in external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation: comparison of surrogates for the lumpectomy cavity.
Hasan Y; Kim L; Martinez A; Vicini F; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):619-25. PubMed ID: 18164869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients: surgical clips as surrogate for breast excision cavity.
Topolnjak R; de Ruiter P; Remeijer P; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; Rasch C; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(3):e187-95. PubMed ID: 21345615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing digital tomosynthesis to cone-beam CT for position verification in patients undergoing partial breast irradiation.
Zhang J; Wu QJ; Godfrey DJ; Fatunase T; Marks LB; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Mar; 73(3):952-7. PubMed ID: 19135316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of registration accuracy in accelerated partial breast irradiation using the point-based rigid-body registration algorithm for patients with implanted fiducial markers.
Inoue M; Yoshimura M; Sato S; Nakamura M; Yamada M; Hirata K; Sasaki M; Fujimoto T; Ogura M; Hiraoka M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1904-10. PubMed ID: 25832080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
Sheybani EO; Sankar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
Van Ongeval Ch
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast tomosynthesis.
Diekmann F; Bick U
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 21782118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On-line localization of the lumpectomy cavity using surgical clips.
Kim LH; Wong J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(4):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17967320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.
Gur D; Abrams GS; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Perrin RL; Rathfon GY; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML; Bandos AI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 19620460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital mammography: novel applications.
Rafferty EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
