These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22206941)

  • 1. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
    Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
    Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
    Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
    Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
    Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
    Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
    Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
    Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
    J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
    Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
    Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
    Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
    Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
    Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
    Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Problems of the preoperative prediction of the pathological stage in prostate cancer].
    Konomoto T; Naito S
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2003 Jan; 30(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12557700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial neural network for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in a Taiwanese population.
    Tsao CW; Liu CY; Cha TL; Wu ST; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chen HI; Chang SY; Chen SC; Hsu CY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):513-8. PubMed ID: 25175002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.