692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22206941)
1. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2011 Dec; 78(6):1363-7. PubMed ID: 22137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Problems of the preoperative prediction of the pathological stage in prostate cancer].
Konomoto T; Naito S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2003 Jan; 30(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12557700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial neural network for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in a Taiwanese population.
Tsao CW; Liu CY; Cha TL; Wu ST; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chen HI; Chang SY; Chen SC; Hsu CY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):513-8. PubMed ID: 25175002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
