These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22207582)

  • 21. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
    Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity of Activity Monitor Step Detection Is Related to Movement Patterns.
    Hickey A; John D; Sasaki JE; Mavilia M; Freedson P
    J Phys Act Health; 2016 Feb; 13(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 26107045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Criterion Validity of Competing Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitoring Devices.
    Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 25910051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of two novel monitoring devices to measure physical activity in healthy women.
    Klein DA; Levine E; Walsh BT; Sazonov ES
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():1727-30. PubMed ID: 25570309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity of physical activity monitors for assessing lower intensity activity in adults.
    Calabró MA; Lee JM; Saint-Maurice PF; Yoo H; Welk GJ
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2014 Sep; 11():119. PubMed ID: 25260625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity of the SenseWear Armband to assess energy expenditure in graded walking.
    Vernillo G; Savoldelli A; Pellegrini B; Schena F
    J Phys Act Health; 2015 Feb; 12(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 24508986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.
    Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of intensity-based cut-points for the RT3 accelerometer in youth.
    Joschtel BJ; Trost SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 24262335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors.
    Ryan J; Gormley J
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2013; 13(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 24251746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of activPAL defined sedentary time and breaks in sedentary time in 4- to 6-year-olds.
    Janssen X; Cliff DP; Reilly JJ; Hinkley T; Jones RA; Batterham M; Ekelund U; Brage S; Okely AD
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2014 Feb; 26(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 24019006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of energy expenditure estimation of several physical activity monitors.
    Dannecker KL; Sazonova NA; Melanson EL; Sazonov ES; Browning RC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2105-12. PubMed ID: 23669877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of pattern-recognition monitors in children using doubly labeled water.
    Calabró MA; Stewart JM; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jul; 45(7):1313-22. PubMed ID: 23299766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Criterion and concurrent validity of the activPAL™ professional physical activity monitor in adolescent females.
    Dowd KP; Harrington DM; Donnelly AE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47633. PubMed ID: 23094069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, Matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity.
    Crouter SE; DellaValle DM; Haas JD; Frongillo EA; Bassett DR
    J Phys Act Health; 2013 May; 10(4):504-14. PubMed ID: 22975460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of epoch and uniaxial versus triaxial accelerometers in the measurement of physical activity in preschool children: a validation study.
    Hislop JF; Bulley C; Mercer TH; Reilly JJ
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2012 Aug; 24(3):450-60. PubMed ID: 22971560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of the Actical Accelerometer in Multiethnic Preschoolers: The Children's Healthy Living (CHL) Program.
    Ettienne R; Nigg CR; Li F; Su Y; McGlone K; Luick B; Tachibana A; Carran C; Mercado J; Novotny R
    Hawaii J Med Public Health; 2016 Apr; 75(4):95-100. PubMed ID: 27099804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of three activity monitors for estimating sedentary time among children.
    Stålesen J; Vik FN; Hansen BH; Berntsen S
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2016; 8():2. PubMed ID: 26855784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validity and reliability of the activPAL3 for measuring posture and stepping in adults and young people.
    Sellers C; Dall P; Grant M; Stansfield B
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():42-7. PubMed ID: 26669950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.