111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22208436)
1. Appropriateness of cesarean sections using the RAND Appropriateness Method criteria.
Ostovar R; Pourreza A; Rashidian A; Rashidi BH; Hantooshzadeh S; Haghollai F; Ardebili HE; Mahmoudi M
Arch Iran Med; 2012 Jan; 15(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22208436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness method.
Ostovar R; Rashidian A; Pourreza A; Rashidi BH; Hantooshzadeh S; Ardebili HE; Mahmoudi M;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2010 Sep; 10():52. PubMed ID: 20840776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cesarean sections in Senegal: coverage of needs and quality of services].
Cisse CT; Faye EO; de Bernis L; Dujardin B; Diadhiou F
Sante; 1998; 8(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 9854015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of a multifaceted strategy to improve the appropriateness of cesarean sections.
Calvo A; Campillo C; Juan M; Roig C; Hermoso JC; Cabeza PJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(7):842-5. PubMed ID: 19488884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disclosing doubtful indications for emergency cesarean sections in rural hospitals in Tanzania: a retrospective criterion-based audit.
Maaløe N; Bygbjerg IC; Onesmo R; Secher NJ; Sorensen BL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Sep; 91(9):1069-76. PubMed ID: 22642620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Appropriateness of immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel diseases assessed by RAND method: Italian Group for IBD (IG-IBD) position statement.
Caprilli R; Angelucci E; Cocco A; Viscido A; Annese V; Ardizzone S; Biancone L; Castiglione F; Cottone M; Meucci G; Paoluzi P; Papi C; Sturniolo GC; Vecchi M
Dig Liver Dis; 2005 Jun; 37(6):407-17. PubMed ID: 15893279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand.
Phadungkiatwattana P; Tongsakul N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1375-9. PubMed ID: 21359844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 30-year period in a public hospital in Tehran, Iran.
Badakhsh MH; Seifoddin M; Khodakarami N; Gholami R; Moghimi S
Arch Iran Med; 2012 Jan; 15(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 22208435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean section without medical reason, 1997 to 2006: a Swedish register study.
Karlström A; Rådestad I; Eriksson C; Rubertsson C; Nystedt A; Hildingsson I
Birth; 2010 Mar; 37(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 20402717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Iranian Ministry of Health protocols on cesarean section rate: a quasi-experimental study.
Yavangi M; Sohrabi MR; Alishahi Tabriz A
J Res Health Sci; 2013 May; 13(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 23772016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditing the appropriateness of cesarean delivery using the Robson classification among women experiencing a maternal near miss.
Saleh Gargari S; Essén B; Fallahian M; Mulic-Lutvica A; Mohammadi S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 144(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 30353540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR
Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH.
Hillemanns P; Strauss A; Hasbargen U; Schulze A; Genzel-Boroviczeny O; Weninger E; Hepp H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 273(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 16044190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The appropriateness of chiropractic spinal manipulation for low back pain: a pilot study.
Shekelle PG; Hurwitz EL; Coulter I; Adams AH; Genovese B; Brook RH
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 7673792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-based standardization (PBS) of institutional cesarean delivery rates.
Grünebaum A; Chervenak F; Skupski D
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 18211257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Frequency of cesarean sections in four hospitals of Mexico City: 20 years later].
Narro Robles J; Hernández Torón JC; Imaz Olguín V; Jesús Silva JA; Olea López J; Soto Hernández G; Ruiz Ruisánchez A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Jun; 73(6):291-6. PubMed ID: 16309034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990-2006.
Hemminki E; Klemetti R; Gissler M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(10):1138-44. PubMed ID: 19707896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.
Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
