These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22208827)

  • 1. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part II.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22208827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
    Collins M; Curtis A; Artis K; Staib L; Bokhari J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):961-6. PubMed ID: 21129688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective.
    Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Kohn MW
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Aug; 35(8):648-51. PubMed ID: 267189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE; Wetherholt S
    J Surg Educ; 2007; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergency medicine residency applicant views on the interview day process.
    Deiorio NM; Yarris LM; Gaines SA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Dec; 16 Suppl 2():S67-70. PubMed ID: 20053215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
    Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
    Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical skills assessment of applicants to general surgery residency.
    Panait L; Larios JM; Brenes RA; Fancher TT; Ajemian MS; Dudrick SJ; Sanchez JA
    J Surg Res; 2011 Oct; 170(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 21612796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
    Bernstein AD; Jazrawi LM; Elbeshbeshy B; Della Valle CJ; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2002-2003; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations.
    Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthopedic Surgery Applicants: What They Want in an Interview and How They Are Influenced by Post-Interview Contact.
    Camp CL; Sousa PL; Hanssen AD; Karam MD; Haidukewych GJ; Oakes DA; Turner NS
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):709-14. PubMed ID: 27137662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behaviorally anchored ranking scale versus letters of recommendation for evaluating residency candidates.
    Doutré WH; Buesing AS; Ingrim NB; Guernsey BG; Hokanson JA; Galvan E
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Nov; 41(11):2367-70. PubMed ID: 6507439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors used by pediatric emergency medicine program directors to select their fellows.
    Poirier MP; Pruitt CW
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2003 Jun; 19(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 12813299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How well will you FIT? Use of a modified MMI to assess applicants' compatibility with an emergency medicine residency program.
    Min AA; Leetch A; Nuño T; Fiorello AB
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29587. PubMed ID: 26842824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.
    Vadi MG; Malkin MR; Lenart J; Stier GR; Gatling JW; Applegate RL
    Int J Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 7():102-8. PubMed ID: 27039029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The surgical residency interview: a candidate-centered, working approach.
    Seabott H; Smith RK; Alseidi A; Thirlby RC
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):802-6. PubMed ID: 23111050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the interview in pediatric residency selection.
    Swanson WS; Harris MC; Master C; Gallagher PR; Mauro AE; Ludwig S
    Ambul Pediatr; 2005; 5(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 16026186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.