199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22208865)
21. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of the biomechanical behavior of short implants: The photo-elasticity method.
Pellizzer EP; de Mello CC; Santiago Junior JF; de Souza Batista VE; de Faria Almeida DA; Verri FR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Oct; 55():187-92. PubMed ID: 26117754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of finite element models for strain analysis of implant-supported prostheses using digital image correlation.
Tiossi R; Vasco MA; Lin L; Conrad HJ; Bezzon OL; Ribeiro RF; Fok AS
Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 23694844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Hsu ML; Chen FC; Kao HC; Cheng CK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17465356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Kong L; Gu Z; Li T; Wu J; Hu K; Liu Y; Zhou H; Liu B
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 19918598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional image correlation analyses for strains generated by cement and screw-retained implant prostheses.
Clelland NL; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 22171595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations.
Bakaeen LG; Winkler S; Neff PA
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 12498429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism.
Göre E; Evlioğlu G
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22242658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
Rubo JH; Souza EA
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Rismanchian M; Askari N; Shafiei S
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23416848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
