These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22208909)

  • 1. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
    Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
    Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
    Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
    Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
    Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants.
    Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Santiago JF; de Moraes SL; de Carvalho BM
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 20545530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.
    Murmura G; Di Iorio D; Cicchetti AR; Sinjari B; Caputi S
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 21231867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of implant angulation with different crowns on stress distribution.
    Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Sánchez DM; Rinaldi GA; de Aguirre CC; Goiato MC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 21403571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
    Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis.
    Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; Sônego MV; de Lima TM; Pesqueira AA; Dos Santos DM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27696920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
    Hanaoka M; Gehrke SA; Mardegan F; Gennari CR; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Corbella S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 24750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
    Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.
    Prados-Privado M; Gehrke SA; Rojo R; Prados-Frutos JC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 30427957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Analysis of Internal Tapered Implant-Abutment Connections: Evaluating the Morse Effect.
    Nogueira Barbosa Marchon R; Mourão CF; Rutkowski JL; Ghanaati S; Mello-Machado RC; Mendes Senna P
    J Oral Implantol; 2024 Aug; 50(4):431-434. PubMed ID: 38826061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.