These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22209530)

  • 21. Graded size sensitivity of object-exemplar-evoked activity patterns within human LOC subregions.
    Eger E; Kell CA; Kleinschmidt A
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 100(4):2038-47. PubMed ID: 18632884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual asymmetries influence task choice: the effect of lateralised presentation of hierarchical stimuli.
    Arrington CM; Rhodes KM
    Laterality; 2010 Sep; 15(5):501-13. PubMed ID: 19557621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum?
    Cowell RA; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2460-79. PubMed ID: 19929757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Categorization of biologically significant objects, food and gender, in rhesus monkeys. I. Behavioral study.
    Inoue T; Hasegawa T; Takara S; Lukáts B; Mizuno M; Aou S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 May; 61(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 18329121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.
    Ghose GM; Yang T; Maunsell JH
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 87(4):1867-88. PubMed ID: 11929908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do discrimination tasks discourage multi-dimensional stimulus processing? Evidence from a cross-modal object discrimination in rats.
    Jeffery KJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 17692934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies.
    Dahl CD; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH; Logothetis NK
    Curr Biol; 2009 Mar; 19(6):509-13. PubMed ID: 19249210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli.
    Wasserman EA; Frank AJ; Young ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 12395492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of lesions of telencephalic visual structures on visual discriminative performance in turtles (Chrysemys picta picta).
    Reiner A; Powers AS
    J Comp Neurol; 1983 Jul; 218(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 6886065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Self-controlled visual discrimination learning of group-housed dwarf goats (Capra hircus): behavioral strategies and effects of relocation on learning and memory.
    Langbein J; Nürnberg G; Puppe B; Manteuffel G
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Feb; 120(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 16551165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of early visual cortex interferes with subjective visual awareness and objective forced-choice performance.
    Koivisto M; Railo H; Salminen-Vaparanta N
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 20863717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Face categorization and behavioral templates in rats.
    Schnell AE; Van den Bergh G; Vermaercke B; Gijbels K; Bossens C; de Beeck HO
    J Vis; 2019 Dec; 19(14):9. PubMed ID: 31826254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using an abstract geometry in virtual reality to explore choice behaviour: visual flicker preferences in honeybees.
    Van De Poll MN; Zajaczkowski EL; Taylor GJ; Srinivasan MV; van Swinderen B
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Nov; 218(Pt 21):3448-60. PubMed ID: 26347568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition.
    Zoccolan D; Oertelt N; DiCarlo JJ; Cox DD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 May; 106(21):8748-53. PubMed ID: 19429704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A computationally informed comparison between the strategies of rodents and humans in visual object recognition.
    Schnell AE; Leemans M; Vinken K; Op de Beeck H
    Elife; 2023 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 38079481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing species decisions in a dichotomous choice task: adjusting task parameters improves performance in monkeys.
    Prétôt L; Bshary R; Brosnan SF
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Jul; 19(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 27086302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual recognition of mirror, video-recorded, and still images in rats.
    Yakura T; Yokota H; Ohmichi Y; Ohmichi M; Nakano T; Naito M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194215. PubMed ID: 29534087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrimination of computer-graphic stimuli by mice: a method for the behavioral characterization of transgenic and gene-knockout models.
    Bussey TJ; Saksida LM; Rothblat LA
    Behav Neurosci; 2001 Aug; 115(4):957-60. PubMed ID: 11508736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preferences of rats given early temporal visual patterns.
    Oswalt RM; Medsker AE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 4686698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of number of items and visual display variability on same-different discrimination behavior.
    Castro L; Young ME; Wasserman EA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Dec; 34(8):1689-703. PubMed ID: 17489295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.