These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22209768)

  • 1. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: II. recovery functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 22202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: triphasic pulses with cathodic second phase.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():123-30. PubMed ID: 24161948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase.
    Herrmann DP; Kretzer KVA; Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108375. PubMed ID: 34749281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):332-343. PubMed ID: 28045836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
    Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
    Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML; Goehring JL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e247-55. PubMed ID: 26928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
    Tian Y; Li W; Wang Z; Yang N; Hui L; Jiang X
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.
    Cafarelli Dees D; Dillier N; Lai WK; von Wallenberg E; van Dijk B; Akdas F; Aksit M; Batman C; Beynon A; Burdo S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Conway M; Coudert C; Craddock L; Cullington H; Deggouj N; Fraysse B; Grabel S; Kiefer J; Kiss JG; Lenarz T; Mair A; Maune S; Müller-Deile J; Piron JP; Razza S; Tasche C; Thai-Van H; Toth F; Truy E; Uziel A; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15650302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.