BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210091)

  • 1. Panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer after progression on cetuximab.
    Wadlow RC; Hezel AF; Abrams TA; Blaszkowsky LS; Fuchs CS; Kulke MH; Kwak EL; Meyerhardt JA; Ryan DP; Szymonifka J; Wolpin BM; Zhu AX; Clark JW
    Oncologist; 2012; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 22210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panitumumab after progression on cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single institution experience.
    Marino A; Caliolo C; Sponziello F; Nacci A; Quaranta A; Mazzoni E; Lutrino SE; Rizzo P; Calvani N; Orlando L; Schiavone P; Fedele P; D'Amico M; Chetrì MC; Cinefra M; Ferrara P; Cinieri S
    Tumori; 2015; 101(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 26045117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study.
    Price TJ; Peeters M; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Zhang K; Murugappan S; Sidhu R
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24739896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Reidy DL; Vakiani E; Fakih MG; Saif MW; Hecht JR; Goodman-Davis N; Hollywood E; Shia J; Schwartz J; Chandrawansa K; Dontabhaktuni A; Youssoufian H; Solit DB; Saltz LB
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4240-6. PubMed ID: 20713879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single agent panitumumab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients following cetuximab-based regimens: Clinical outcome and biomarkers of efficacy.
    Pietrantonio F; Perrone F; Biondani P; Maggi C; Lampis A; Bertan C; Venturini F; Tondulli L; Ferrari D; Ricci V; Villa F; Barone G; Bianco N; Ghidini A; Bossi I; Fanetti G; Di Bartolomeo M; de Braud F
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1098-103. PubMed ID: 24025413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial.
    Seymour MT; Brown SR; Middleton G; Maughan T; Richman S; Gwyther S; Lowe C; Seligmann JF; Wadsley J; Maisey N; Chau I; Hill M; Dawson L; Falk S; O'Callaghan A; Benstead K; Chambers P; Oliver A; Marshall H; Napp V; Quirke P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):749-59. PubMed ID: 23725851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Di Nicolantonio F; Martini M; Molinari F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Arena S; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Mazzucchelli L; Frattini M; Siena S; Bardelli A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 26(35):5705-12. PubMed ID: 19001320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.
    Kang MJ; Hong YS; Kim KP; Kim SY; Baek JY; Ryu MH; Lee JL; Chang HM; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Kang YK; Kim TW
    Invest New Drugs; 2012 Aug; 30(4):1607-13. PubMed ID: 21706149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of panitumumab therapy after progression with cetuximab: experience at two institutions.
    Saif MW; Kaley K; Chu E; Copur MS
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2010 Dec; 9(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 21208847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review.
    Tol J; Punt CJ
    Clin Ther; 2010 Mar; 32(3):437-53. PubMed ID: 20399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment effect modification by KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancer.
    Dahabreh IJ; Terasawa T; Castaldi PJ; Trikalinos TA
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jan; 154(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 21200037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cetuximab and panitumumab in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Petrelli F; Borgonovo K; Cabiddu M; Ghilardi M; Barni S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jul; 26(7):823-33. PubMed ID: 21286919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Amado RG; Wolf M; Peeters M; Van Cutsem E; Siena S; Freeman DJ; Juan T; Sikorski R; Suggs S; Radinsky R; Patterson SD; Chang DD
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(10):1626-34. PubMed ID: 18316791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    László L
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panitumumab: in metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.
    Weber J; McCormack PL
    BioDrugs; 2008; 22(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 18998757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Price T; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Guan X; Peeters M
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():51-59. PubMed ID: 27716478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.