These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210091)

  • 1. Panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer after progression on cetuximab.
    Wadlow RC; Hezel AF; Abrams TA; Blaszkowsky LS; Fuchs CS; Kulke MH; Kwak EL; Meyerhardt JA; Ryan DP; Szymonifka J; Wolpin BM; Zhu AX; Clark JW
    Oncologist; 2012; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 22210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panitumumab after progression on cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single institution experience.
    Marino A; Caliolo C; Sponziello F; Nacci A; Quaranta A; Mazzoni E; Lutrino SE; Rizzo P; Calvani N; Orlando L; Schiavone P; Fedele P; D'Amico M; Chetrì MC; Cinefra M; Ferrara P; Cinieri S
    Tumori; 2015; 101(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 26045117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panitumumab versus cetuximab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (ASPECCT): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 study.
    Price TJ; Peeters M; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Zhang K; Murugappan S; Sidhu R
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 May; 15(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24739896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Reidy DL; Vakiani E; Fakih MG; Saif MW; Hecht JR; Goodman-Davis N; Hollywood E; Shia J; Schwartz J; Chandrawansa K; Dontabhaktuni A; Youssoufian H; Solit DB; Saltz LB
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Sep; 28(27):4240-6. PubMed ID: 20713879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single agent panitumumab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients following cetuximab-based regimens: Clinical outcome and biomarkers of efficacy.
    Pietrantonio F; Perrone F; Biondani P; Maggi C; Lampis A; Bertan C; Venturini F; Tondulli L; Ferrari D; Ricci V; Villa F; Barone G; Bianco N; Ghidini A; Bossi I; Fanetti G; Di Bartolomeo M; de Braud F
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1098-103. PubMed ID: 24025413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial.
    Seymour MT; Brown SR; Middleton G; Maughan T; Richman S; Gwyther S; Lowe C; Seligmann JF; Wadsley J; Maisey N; Chau I; Hill M; Dawson L; Falk S; O'Callaghan A; Benstead K; Chambers P; Oliver A; Marshall H; Napp V; Quirke P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jul; 14(8):749-59. PubMed ID: 23725851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Di Nicolantonio F; Martini M; Molinari F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Arena S; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Mazzucchelli L; Frattini M; Siena S; Bardelli A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 26(35):5705-12. PubMed ID: 19001320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No survival benefit from adding cetuximab or panitumumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in KRAS wild type patients: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou SW; Huang YY; Wei Y; Jiang ZM; Zhang YD; Yang Q; Xie DR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50925. PubMed ID: 23226426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.
    Kang MJ; Hong YS; Kim KP; Kim SY; Baek JY; Ryu MH; Lee JL; Chang HM; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Kang YK; Kim TW
    Invest New Drugs; 2012 Aug; 30(4):1607-13. PubMed ID: 21706149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of panitumumab therapy after progression with cetuximab: experience at two institutions.
    Saif MW; Kaley K; Chu E; Copur MS
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2010 Dec; 9(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 21208847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review.
    Tol J; Punt CJ
    Clin Ther; 2010 Mar; 32(3):437-53. PubMed ID: 20399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment effect modification by KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancer.
    Dahabreh IJ; Terasawa T; Castaldi PJ; Trikalinos TA
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jan; 154(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 21200037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cetuximab and panitumumab in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Petrelli F; Borgonovo K; Cabiddu M; Ghilardi M; Barni S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jul; 26(7):823-33. PubMed ID: 21286919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    László L
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Panitumumab: in metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.
    Weber J; McCormack PL
    BioDrugs; 2008; 22(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 18998757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Amado RG; Wolf M; Peeters M; Van Cutsem E; Siena S; Freeman DJ; Juan T; Sikorski R; Suggs S; Radinsky R; Patterson SD; Chang DD
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(10):1626-34. PubMed ID: 18316791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Final results and outcomes by prior bevacizumab exposure, skin toxicity, and hypomagnesaemia from ASPECCT: randomized phase 3 non-inferiority study of panitumumab versus cetuximab in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Price T; Kim TW; Li J; Cascinu S; Ruff P; Suresh AS; Thomas A; Tjulandin S; Guan X; Peeters M
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 68():51-59. PubMed ID: 27716478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.