These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210287)
21. The OSIRIS Weight of Evidence approach: ITS for the endpoints repeated-dose toxicity (RepDose ITS). Tluczkiewicz I; Batke M; Kroese D; Buist H; Aldenberg T; Pauné E; Grimm H; Kühne R; Schüürmann G; Mangelsdorf I; Escher SE Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 23439429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The REACH perspective: toward a new concept of toxicity testing. Schoeters G J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):232-41. PubMed ID: 20574899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Testing REACH draft technical guidance notes for conducting chemical safety assessments-the experience of a downstream user of a preparation. Gade AL; Ovrebø S; Hylland K Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 18479796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Science based guidance for the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals. Bars R; Broeckaert F; Fegert I; Gross M; Hallmark N; Kedwards T; Lewis D; O'Hagan S; Panter GH; Weltje L; Weyers A; Wheeler JR; Galay-Burgos M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 20858523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation: part 4. Experimental terrestrial toxicity assays. Versonnen B; Tarazona JV; Cesnaitis R; Sobanska MA; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; De Coen W Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 475():123-31. PubMed ID: 24238811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrated testing strategy (ITS) for bioaccumulation assessment under REACH. Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Benfentati E; Nendza M; Segner H; Fernández A; Kühne R; Franco A; Pauné E; Schüürmann G Environ Int; 2014 Aug; 69():40-50. PubMed ID: 24806447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection. Valentin J; Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges. Lewis A; Kazantzis N; Fishtik I; Wilcox J J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 16930827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments. Arts JH; Muijser H; Jonker D; van de Sandt JJ; Bos PM; Feron VJ Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 18455380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures. Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tiered toxicity testing: evaluation of toxicity-based decision triggers for human health hazard characterization. Becker RA; Plunkett LM; Borzelleca JF; Kaplan AM Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 45(12):2454-69. PubMed ID: 17689851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. Péry AR; Schüürmann G; Ciffroy P; Faust M; Backhaus T; Aicher L; Mombelli E; Tebby C; Cronin MT; Tissot S; Andres S; Brignon JM; Frewer L; Georgiou S; Mattas K; Vergnaud JC; Peijnenburg W; Capri E; Marchis A; Wilks MF Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():307-16. PubMed ID: 23624004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for environmental toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():29-42. PubMed ID: 19025330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status. Box RJ; Spielmann H Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Strengths and limitations of using repeat-dose toxicity studies to predict effects on fertility. Dent MP Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Aug; 48(3):241-58. PubMed ID: 17512650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implications of chemical mixtures in public health practice. de Rosa CT; El-Masri HA; Pohl H; Cibulas W; Mumtaz MM J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2004; 7(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 15371239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. Larsson CM J Environ Radioact; 2008 Sep; 99(9):1364-70. PubMed ID: 18261830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Towards a theory of tiered testing. Hansson SO; Rudén C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 48(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 17289235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The ECETOC approach to targeted risk assessment; lessons and experiences relevant to REACH. Money CD; Jacobi S; Penman MG; Rodriguez C; De Rooij C; Veenstra G J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S67-71. PubMed ID: 17457324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]