275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210408)
1. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible.
Cosgrove DO; Berg WA; Doré CJ; Skyba DM; Henry JP; Gay J; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Eur Radiol; 2012 May; 22(5):1023-32. PubMed ID: 22210408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e680-5. PubMed ID: 23988689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Togawa R; Pfob A; Büsch C; Fastner S; Gomez C; Goncalo M; Hennigs A; Killinger K; Nees J; Riedel F; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Tozaki M; Heil J; Barr R; Golatta M
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 37772458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shearwave elastography: Phantom study.
Mun HS; Choi SH; Kook SH; Choi Y; Jeong WK; Kim Y
Ultrasonics; 2013 Jul; 53(5):1039-43. PubMed ID: 23466037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Han KH; Kim JA
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2695-704. PubMed ID: 23652850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Kim SJ; Kim JY; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):1015-26. PubMed ID: 23085867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses.
Lee SH; Cho N; Chang JM; Koo HR; Kim JY; Kim WH; Bae MS; Yi A; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 24029644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra-observer reproducibility and diagnostic performance of breast shear-wave elastography in Asian women.
Park HY; Han KH; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1058-64. PubMed ID: 24636639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements.
Yoon JH; Ko KH; Jung HK; Lee JT
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2199-204. PubMed ID: 24041435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?
Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?
Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography - Virtual touch
Dória MT; Jales RM; Conz L; Derchain SFM; Sarian LOZ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():74-80. PubMed ID: 30927963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in evaluating breast solid mass.
Hong S; Woo OH; Shin HS; Hwang SY; Cho KR; Seo BK
Clin Imaging; 2017; 44():42-45. PubMed ID: 28402836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
