These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210459)

  • 21. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
    Turnbull NR; Birnie DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17346597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets.
    Reicheneder CA; Baumert U; Gedrange T; Proff P; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 17702795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
    Miles P; Weyant R
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Barbato E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 18174077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket.
    Polat Ö; Gökçelik A; Arman A; Arhun N
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19641768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Friction between archwires of different sizes, cross-section and alloy and brackets ligated with low-friction or conventional ligatures.
    Tecco S; Tetè S; Festa F
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19123711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
    Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
    Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Photoelastic analysis of stress generated by wires when conventional and self-ligating brackets are used: a pilot study.
    Sobral GC; Vedovello Filho M; Degan VV; Santamaria M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 25715719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system.
    Kim TK; Kim KD; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):187.e15-24. PubMed ID: 18249279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nickel titanium springs versus stainless steel springs: A randomized clinical trial of two methods of space closure.
    Norman NH; Worthington H; Chadwick SM
    J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 43(3):176-85. PubMed ID: 26836747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Force decay of elastomeric ligatures: influence on unloading force compared to self-ligation.
    Petersen A; Rosenstein S; Kim KB; Israel H
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):934-8. PubMed ID: 19705929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial.
    Pandis N; Strigou S; Eliades T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Nov; 9(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 17101026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Fleming PS; Dibiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 19123718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
    Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
    Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forces released during alignment with a preadjusted appliance with different types of elastomeric ligatures.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):687-90. PubMed ID: 16679210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.