284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22210691)
1. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics.
Mertins P; Udeshi ND; Clauser KR; Mani DR; Patel J; Ong SE; Jaffe JD; Carr SA
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Jun; 11(6):M111.014423. PubMed ID: 22210691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of SILAC and mTRAQ quantification for phosphoproteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Oppermann FS; Klammer M; Bobe C; Cox J; Schaab C; Tebbe A; Daub H
J Proteome Res; 2013 Sep; 12(9):4089-100. PubMed ID: 23898821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of mTRAQ-labeled proteome using full MS scans.
Kang UB; Yeom J; Kim H; Lee C
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jul; 9(7):3750-8. PubMed ID: 20465265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating influence of cofragmentation on peptide quantification and identification in iTRAQ experiments by simulating multiplexed spectra.
Li H; Hwang KB; Mun DG; Kim H; Lee H; Lee SW; Paek E
J Proteome Res; 2014 Jul; 13(7):3488-97. PubMed ID: 24918111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel triplex isobaric termini labeling quantitative approach for simultaneously supplying three quantitative sources.
Jiang H; Yin H; Xie L; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Yang PY; Lu H
Anal Chim Acta; 2018 Feb; 1001():70-77. PubMed ID: 29291808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Collision-Induced Dissociation Cleavable Isobaric Tag for Peptide Fragment Ion-Based Quantification in Proteomics.
Tian X; de Vries MP; Permentier HP; Bischoff R
J Proteome Res; 2020 Sep; 19(9):3817-3824. PubMed ID: 32786690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research.
Wiese S; Reidegeld KA; Meyer HE; Warscheid B
Proteomics; 2007 Feb; 7(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 17177251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Isobaric labeling-based relative quantification in shotgun proteomics.
Rauniyar N; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5293-309. PubMed ID: 25337643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interference-free proteome quantification with MS/MS-based isobaric isotopologue detection.
Bamberger C; Pankow S; Park SK; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2014 Mar; 13(3):1494-501. PubMed ID: 24417624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative accuracy in mass spectrometry based proteomics of complex samples: the impact of labeling and precursor interference.
Sandberg A; Branca RM; Lehtiö J; Forshed J
J Proteomics; 2014 Jan; 96():133-44. PubMed ID: 24211767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Chen Z; Wang Q; Lin L; Tang Q; Edwards JL; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2908-15. PubMed ID: 22404494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust workflow for iTRAQ-based peptide and protein quantification.
Beck F; Burkhart JM; Geiger J; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():101-13. PubMed ID: 22665297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phospho-iTRAQ: assessing isobaric labels for the large-scale study of phosphopeptide stoichiometry.
Glibert P; Meert P; Van Steendam K; Van Nieuwerburgh F; De Coninck D; Martens L; Dhaenens M; Deforce D
J Proteome Res; 2015 Feb; 14(2):839-49. PubMed ID: 25510630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hyperplex-MRM: a hybrid multiple reaction monitoring method using mTRAQ/iTRAQ labeling for multiplex absolute quantification of human colorectal cancer biomarker.
Yin HR; Zhang L; Xie LQ; Huang LY; Xu Y; Cai SJ; Yang PY; Lu HJ
J Proteome Res; 2013 Sep; 12(9):3912-9. PubMed ID: 23909920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. iTRAQ-Based Shotgun Proteomics Approach for Relative Protein Quantification.
Núñez EV; Domont GB; Nogueira FCS
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1546():267-274. PubMed ID: 27896776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IsobariQ: software for isobaric quantitative proteomics using IPTL, iTRAQ, and TMT.
Arntzen MØ; Koehler CJ; Barsnes H; Berven FS; Treumann A; Thiede B
J Proteome Res; 2011 Feb; 10(2):913-20. PubMed ID: 21067241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a Dual Isolation Width Acquisition Method for Isobaric Labeling Ratio Decompression.
Roumeliotis TI; Weisser H; Choudhary JS
J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1433-1440. PubMed ID: 30576155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Isobaric labeling and data normalization without requiring protein quantitation.
Kim PD; Patel BB; Yeung AT
J Biomol Tech; 2012 Apr; 23(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 22468137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Bantscheff M; Boesche M; Eberhard D; Matthieson T; Sweetman G; Kuster B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2008 Sep; 7(9):1702-13. PubMed ID: 18511480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
