These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2221192)

  • 1. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: further evidence from French.
    Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):665-76. PubMed ID: 9337585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.
    Allport A
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):473-91. PubMed ID: 19891849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Letter position coding in attentional dyslexia.
    Shalev L; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2145-51. PubMed ID: 18420233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: an event-related potential study of the word superiority effect.
    Martin CD; Nazir T; Thierry G; Paulignan Y; Démonet JF
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16774747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.
    Grainger J; Granier JP; Farioli F; Van Assche E; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):865-84. PubMed ID: 16846285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.