233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22211943)
1. Comparison of cryopreserved human sperm from solid surface vitrification and standard vapor freezing method: on motility, morphology, vitality and DNA integrity.
Satirapod C; Treetampinich C; Weerakiet S; Wongkularb A; Rattanasiri S; Choktanasiri W
Andrologia; 2012 May; 44 Suppl 1():786-90. PubMed ID: 22211943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects.
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen VT; Nguyen TTA; Nguyen VQH; Cao NT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():14-20. PubMed ID: 30640121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification.
Isachenko E; Isachenko V; Katkov II; Rahimi G; Schöndorf T; Mallmann P; Dessole S; Nawroth F
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 15016773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modern human sperm freezing: Effect on DNA, chromatin and acrosome integrity.
Rahiminia T; Hosseini A; Anvari M; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Talebi AR
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):472-476. PubMed ID: 28805603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Cryopreserved Human Sperm between Ultra Rapid Freezing and Slow Programmable Freezing: Effect on Motility, Morphology and DNA Integrity.
Tongdee P; Sukprasert M; Satirapod C; Wongkularb A; Choktanasiri W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 May; 98 Suppl 4():S33-42. PubMed ID: 26201132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different cryoprotective agents on ram sperm morphology and DNAintegrity.
Nur Z; Zik B; Ustuner B; Sagirkaya H; Ozguden CG
Theriogenology; 2010 Jun; 73(9):1267-75. PubMed ID: 20172600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Catalase improves motility, vitality and DNA integrity of cryopreserved human spermatozoa.
Moubasher AE; El Din AM; Ali ME; El-sherif WT; Gaber HD
Andrologia; 2013 Apr; 45(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 22591546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cryodamage on sperm chromatin according to different freezing methods, assessed by AO test.
Petyim S; Choavaratana R
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Mar; 89(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 16696413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryopreservation and sperm DNA integrity.
Gandini L; Lombardo F; Lenzi A; Spanò M; Dondero F
Cell Tissue Bank; 2006; 7(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 16732411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li YX; Zhou L; Lv MQ; Ge P; Liu YC; Zhou DX
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():84-92. PubMed ID: 30580229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method for native human sperm.
Aizpurua J; Medrano L; Enciso M; Sarasa J; Romero A; Fernández MA; Gómez-Torres MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 28938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cryo-injury of sperm chromatin according to computer controlled rate freezing method part 2.
Dejarkom S; Kunathikom S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):852-6. PubMed ID: 17596036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cryopreserved human sperm in vapor and liquid phases of liquid nitrogen: effect on motility parameters, morphology, and sperm function.
Punyatanasakchai P; Sophonsritsuk A; Weerakiet S; Wansumrit S; Chompurat D
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1978-82. PubMed ID: 18222437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryopreservation of Low Number of Human Spermatozoa; Which is Better: Vapor Phase or Direct Submerging in Liquid Nitrogen?
Hosseini A; Khalili MA; Talebi AR; Agha-Rahimi A; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Woodward B; Yari N
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Jun; 22(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29749276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid freezing versus slow programmable freezing of human spermatozoa.
Vutyavanich T; Piromlertamorn W; Nunta S
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1921-8. PubMed ID: 19243759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cryoinjury of sperm chromatin according to liquid nitrogen vapour method (I).
Ngamwuttiwong T; Kunathikom S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 17375624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of cryopreservation on phosphatidylserine translocation, intracellular hydrogen peroxide, and DNA integrity in canine sperm.
Kim SH; Yu DH; Kim YJ
Theriogenology; 2010 Feb; 73(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 19883935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of different centrifugation protocols on equine semen preservation.
Hoogewijs M; Rijsselaere T; De Vliegher S; Vanhaesebrouck E; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Thys M; Hoflack G; Van Soom A; de Kruif A
Theriogenology; 2010 Jul; 74(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 20207406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in motion characteristics, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome morphology during cryopreservation of buffalo spermatozoa.
Rasul Z; Ahmad N; Anzar M
J Androl; 2001; 22(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 11229802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification and freezing in vapor: effect on motility, DNA integrity, and fertilization ability.
Isachenko V; Isachenko E; Katkov II; Montag M; Dessole S; Nawroth F; Van Der Ven H
Biol Reprod; 2004 Oct; 71(4):1167-73. PubMed ID: 15175233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
