206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22212067)
1. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.
de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of AFIS "sufficiency" in friction ridge examination.
Neumann C; Armstrong DE; Wu T
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():114-125. PubMed ID: 27111746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.
Dror IE; Champod C; Langenburg G; Charlton D; Hunt H; Rosenthal R
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):10-7. PubMed ID: 21129867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
Dror I; Rosenthal R
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation.
Dror IE; Hampikian G
Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 22137054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects and benefits of a latent print AFIS deferral policy.
Hudman R; Hines D; Hilliard S
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112047. PubMed ID: 38733654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altered fingerprints: analysis and detection.
Yoon S; Feng J; Jain AK
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2012 Mar; 34(3):451-64. PubMed ID: 21808092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
