These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22212188)

  • 1. Commissioned reviews.
    Polton G
    J Small Anim Pract; 2012 Jan; 53(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22212188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. References, reliability and readership.
    Cooper JE
    J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Jul; 51(7):359-60. PubMed ID: 20626783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic imaging and other disciplines: The importance of quality review articles in veterinary medicine.
    Wilkinson T; Mattoon JS
    Vet J; 2015 Dec; 206(3):251. PubMed ID: 26526866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer treatment reviews welcomes submission of the Cochrane Reviews.
    Pavlidis N; Stahel R; Clarke M; Djulbegovic B
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2006 Jun; 32(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 16713102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Present and future of French medical reviews].
    Bénichoux R
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1979 Mar; 163(3):256-61; discussion 261-4. PubMed ID: 15672586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical curriculum reviews: a step forward in sport medicine.
    Kohl HW; Shrier I
    Clin J Sport Med; 1996 Oct; 6(4):218-9. PubMed ID: 8894332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of systematic reviews is vital for scientific and clinical practice.
    Farooq S; Irfan UM; Irfan M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jul; 18(7):460-2. PubMed ID: 18760076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Citation characteristics of periodical literature in veterinary science.
    Cho YJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1977 Jan; 38(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 835861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Writing evidence-based clinical reviews.
    Siwek J
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):175. PubMed ID: 11820483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. JEBDP improves grading system and adopts strength of recommendation taxonomy grading (SORT) for guidelines and systematic reviews.
    Newman MG; Weyant R; Hujoel P
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2007 Dec; 7(4):147-50. PubMed ID: 18155075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Do we need methodological standards for literature reviews?].
    Slim K
    J Chir (Paris); 2000 Aug; 137(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 10992049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Overview of the most important veterinary medicine review publications and their methods].
    Renk W; Lüdcke K
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1970 Feb; 83(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 5519280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
    Leibovici L; Reeves D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2005 Nov; 56(5):803-4. PubMed ID: 16166177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews.
    Collins JA; Fauser BC
    Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 15618290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The lure of reviews.
    Nat Immunol; 2011 Sep; 12(10):915. PubMed ID: 21934666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery to begin its seventh year.
    McLeod RS
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2007 Nov; 92(11):26-7. PubMed ID: 18041234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new classification for retrospective reviews of medical records.
    Matushek KJ; Audin JH
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 232(1):6. PubMed ID: 18167102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration.
    Kale R; Silagy C
    Natl Med J India; 1996; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8713515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.