67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22212650)
21. Taking a satisfactory cervical cytologic smear. Is it really an easy procedure?
Bar-Am A; Niv J; Segal A
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1781-4. PubMed ID: 9390141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inadequate screening in patients evaluated by nongynecologists for cervical cancer: a case control analysis.
Cole ME; Milam MR; Scott TA; Jones HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):e48-50. PubMed ID: 18342826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy.
Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cytologic evaluation of smears obtained by self-collection vaginal tampon.
Reowchopisakul K; Linasmita V; Srivannaboon S; Suthutvoravut S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 May; 76(5):260-3. PubMed ID: 8006556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical parameters associated with unsatisfactory specimens of conventional cervical smears.
Lu CH; Chang CC; Chang MC; Chen SJ; Jan YJ; Fu TF; Ho ES
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Feb; 39(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 20091895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials.
Yoshida T; Fukuda T; Sano T; Kanuma T; Owada N; Nakajima T
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15098254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new look at cervical cytology. ThinPrep multicenter trial results.
Hutchinson ML; Agarwal P; Denault T; Berger B; Cibas ES
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 1636340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of water-soluble gel in obtaining the cervical cytologic smear.
Casselman CW; Crutcher RA; Jadusingh IH
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1861-2. PubMed ID: 9390161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vaginal speculum lubrication and its effects on cervical cytology and microbiology.
Griffith WF; Stuart GS; Gluck KL; Heartwell SF
Contraception; 2005 Jul; 72(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 15964294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of vaginal speculum lubrication on the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cytology diagnosis.
Amies AM; Miller L; Lee SK; Koutsky L
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):889-92. PubMed ID: 12423848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomised controlled trial comparing a dilating vaginal speculum with a conventional bivalve speculum.
Thomas A; Weisberg E; Lieberman D; Fraser IS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 11787909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does lubrication of the vaginal speculum reduce pain during a gynecologic oncology examination?
Gungorduk K; Ozdemir A; Gökçü M; Sancı M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():84-8. PubMed ID: 25481363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
