These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22212910)

  • 1. Role of streaming potential on pulsating mass flow rate control in combined electroosmotic and pressure-driven microfluidic devices.
    Chakraborty J; Ray S; Chakraborty S
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Feb; 33(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 22212910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of pressure-driven microfluidic networks using electric circuit analogy.
    Oh KW; Lee K; Ahn B; Furlani EP
    Lab Chip; 2012 Feb; 12(3):515-45. PubMed ID: 22179505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancement of electrokinetically driven microfluidic T-mixer using frequency modulated electric field and channel geometry effects.
    Yan D; Yang C; Miao J; Lam Y; Huang X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Sep; 30(18):3144-52. PubMed ID: 19764063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joule heating effects on electroosmotic flow in insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Sridharan S; Zhu J; Hu G; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(17):2274-81. PubMed ID: 21792988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroosmotic flows of non-Newtonian power-law fluids in a cylindrical microchannel.
    Zhao C; Yang C
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Mar; 34(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 23229874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple mechanism for reliable particle sorting in a microdevice with combined electroosmotic and pressure-driven flow.
    Johann R; Renaud P
    Electrophoresis; 2004 Nov; 25(21-22):3720-9. PubMed ID: 15565695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A microfluidic device for performing pressure-driven separations.
    Dutta D; Ramsey JM
    Lab Chip; 2011 Sep; 11(18):3081-8. PubMed ID: 21789335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analytical approach to the effect of finite-sized end reservoirs on electroosmotic transport through narrow confinements.
    Pal D; Chakraborty S
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Feb; 32(5):638-45. PubMed ID: 21294133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of electrical field-induced flow reversal in a microchannel.
    Pirat C; Naso A; van der Wouden EJ; Gardeniers JG; Lohse D; van den Berg A
    Lab Chip; 2008 Jun; 8(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 18497916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model based design of a microfluidic mixer driven by induced charge electroosmosis.
    Harnett CK; Templeton J; Dunphy-Guzman KA; Senousy YM; Kanouff MP
    Lab Chip; 2008 Apr; 8(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 18369511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical analysis of field-modulated electroosmotic flows in microchannels with arbitrary numbers and configurations of discrete electrodes.
    Chao K; Chen B; Wu J
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Dec; 12(6):959-66. PubMed ID: 20668948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bi-directional flow induced by an AC electroosmotic micropump with DC voltage bias.
    Islam N; Reyna J
    Electrophoresis; 2012 Apr; 33(7):1191-7. PubMed ID: 22539322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of nonuniform surface potential on electroosmotic flow at large applied electric field strength.
    Chen L; Conlisk AT
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Feb; 11(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18850273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical studies of continuous nutrient delivery for tumour spheroid culture in a microchannel by electrokinetically-induced pressure-driven flow.
    Movahed S; Li D
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Dec; 12(6):1061-72. PubMed ID: 20689992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toolbox for the design of optimized microfluidic components.
    Mott DR; Howell PB; Golden JP; Kaplan CR; Ligler FS; Oran ES
    Lab Chip; 2006 Apr; 6(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 16572217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of streaming potential on pulsatile pressure-gradient driven flow through an annulus.
    Shenoy A; Chakraborty J; Chakraborty S
    Electrophoresis; 2013 Mar; 34(5):691-9. PubMed ID: 23192458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure generation at the junction of two microchannels with different depths.
    Yanagisawa N; Dutta D
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Jun; 31(12):2080-8. PubMed ID: 20503204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of electroosmotic flow through nanoporous self-assembled arrays.
    Bell K; Gomes M; Nazemifard N
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Aug; 36(15):1738-43. PubMed ID: 25964193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards high concentration enhancement of microfluidic temperature gradient focusing of sample solutes using combined AC and DC field induced Joule heating.
    Ge Z; Wang W; Yang C
    Lab Chip; 2011 Apr; 11(7):1396-402. PubMed ID: 21331425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On hybrid electroosmotic kinetics for field-effect-reconfigurable nanoparticle trapping in a four-terminal spiral microelectrode array.
    Ren Y; Song C; Liu W; Jiang T; Song J; Wu Q; Jiang H
    Electrophoresis; 2019 Mar; 40(6):979-992. PubMed ID: 30256428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.